Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks
From: kr1g@hotmail.com (ted demopoulos)
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 03:46:21
Ron,

I'm putting up towers conservatively (lotsa concrete, far guying) and 
basically ignoring Rohns specs. I think most are ignoring Rohn's spec - they 
are conservative.

Towers do come down around here, but almost always when a tree hits them or 
the guys,

73
Ted, KR1G
PS: also remember that a C4-XL, for example, at the top is not the same as 
one half the height.


>From: "Ron Bolton" <wu4g@pipeline.com>
>To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Subject: [TowerTalk] Rohn and Stacks
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
>Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 20:41:10 -0400
>
>
>Unless I'm missing something here, I'm confused.  I see the ads for 
>stacking
>controller boxes, rotating tower bearings, rotating rings and such for
>mounting multiple beams on a single tower.  The rings systems and the
>rotation tower systems all make models for 45G and 55G.   As I have some
>interest in going that direction I decided to spec out some components and
>then figure up costs to see if I could make my dream a reality.   What I
>found in the process is that the specs don't add up.   I started with the
>current Rohn catalog specs for both 45G and 55G.  As I'm in a 75MPH rated
>location, I used the 90MPH figures for 55G.  For a 100' tower, it's only
>rated for 16.0 sq. ft. which means stacking just  two C-4XL's exceed the
>limits.  So from what I see, unless you're lucky enough to live in an area
>where you can use the 70MPH ratings, if you want to stack, you're limited 
>to
>something like a TA33.  So what's going on with all these pictures I see of
>these nice stack installations?  Is everyone ignoring the manufacturer's
>specs?  Can't believe the solution is to add more guys to increase the
>ratings as then you can't fit the lower antennas it and rotate them,
>besides, there are no specs from Rohn on how adding more guys affects the
>ratings without using their design service.  Is something else besides 55G
>being used?  If so, what (and is reasonably priced)?  How can the ring
>systems and rotating tower systems honestly market products for 45G/55G 
>when
>the towers aren't rated for that type of installation in the first place?
>And finally, if I'd like to stack 2 or 3 decent multibanders (like a 
>C-4XL),
>what do you use for tower?
>Thanks.
>
>
>
>List Sponsored by AN Wireless:  AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems,
>Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our self
>supporting towers up to 100 feet for under $1500!!  
>http://www.anwireless.com
>
>-----
>FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
>Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
>Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp


List Sponsored by AN Wireless:  AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems,
Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check out our self
supporting towers up to 100 feet for under $1500!!  http://www.anwireless.com

-----
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk
Submissions:              towertalk@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-towertalk@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>