On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:44:20 -0400, "Jim White, K4OJ"
<k4oj@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>WHAT?
>
>You want his towers limited????
I said no such thing. Read my post again.
>It does not matter how high they are to the neighbors...
Of course it does. An attitude like yours is why there are "neighbor
problems" in the first place.
>the difference
>between 50 foot and 150 foot as far as height is irrelevant to them...
>it is a tower and to THEIR insensitive bigotry they are all the same...
More nonsense. A 50 foot tower is quite a different thing from a 150
footer.
>I can easily understand the need for two high towers minimum, to support
>a dipole type antenna between them... but that is only for one pair of
>azimuthal options... three towers makes arrays which will be broadside
>to six different areas possible!
Agreed. The issue here is not radiation effectiveness, it's neighbor
relations.
>As far as some people are concerned if the neighbor puts up towers it is
>like a person of the wrong ethnic background moving into their
>neighborhood... they feel unjustifiably incensed and are convinced that
>soon hell will freeze over...
Agreed.
>Neighbors suck... best option is to find area near a pasture full of
>cows - they do not bitch!
Also agreed. That's partly why I moved out of the city into the
desert where my nearest neighbor is 1000' away and the next one beyond
him is another 1000'.
>I still cannot believe you told this guy he had nerve asking to have
>three towers 90 foot!
I can not believe you misread my post so badly. Read it again. I
only said I thought he was pushing the neighbors a bit much.
--
Bill, W7TI
|