To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56 |
From: | Bill Fuqua <wlfuqu00@uky.edu> |
Date: | Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:01:49 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
What is so great about nonmetallic towers? I seem to be missing something here. They will not stop lightning and I suspect that if they are hit. And strong electric fields develop across any of the nonmetallic members the material may just explode due to the internal stresses in the "dielectric" bonding material. I can see lighting hitting the antenna and going down the feed-line and damaging the tower along the way. Do they mention the dielectric strength of the tower or resistance. Is it non-conductive? 73 Bill wa4lav The thread about nonmetallic towers prompted me to contact the folks at IsoTruss. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA. _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Nonconductive Towers, Robert Shohet |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56, Daly, Greg TQO |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Re: Nonconductive Towers, Ward Silver |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 11, Issue 56, Pete Smith |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |