Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] BPL

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] BPL
From: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Reply-to: kd4e@verizon.net
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 19:59:30 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Nothing appalling at all -- I was just responding to the posturing
of the Dems on the ARRL site -- the Republicans didn't pretend
that they were friends of Hams while doing nothing, the Dems
did.

Obvious to one who teaches critical thinking and logic skills.

If we are to defend the hobby we need to watch out for those
who will lead us down the primrose path of pretending to be
our friends and who then betray us.

We are in better stead to deal with those who directly and
honestly disagree.

It is not partisanship, it is wisdom. IMHO, YMMV :-) doc

Robert Shohet wrote:
It is really APPALLING that you can take an issue like this, that
affects ALL of us, and use it as an flimsy excuse to slam Democrats!
>
The FCC Democrats are posturing like Kerry, big words but zero
action -- they could have made a big noise and have demanded
real protections *prior* to approval but are trying to benefit
from the appearance of caring about Hams as they gave the
industry what it wanted.


--
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
West Central Florida  100% Linux.  Suse 9.1
Drake, Hallicrafters, Heathkit, TenTec, Yaesu
Radio Life: http://www.gospelcom.net/twr/
Linux-Incompatible hardware is defective!
USA Pres. Election 2004: http://www.rnc.org/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>