Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] yv5mbx - QSK question

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>,"Javier Remoto" <jlopez@plasticosomega.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] yv5mbx - QSK question
From: "Goran Arezina, T98G" <t98g@teol.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:05:19 +0100
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hello Javier,

There is no advantage at all if you are at that level of speed.Even you will 
get a troubles.
Advantage might be if you are very good with that CW, so you can listen and 
follow a few stations at same time.
As soon as you improve your speed to a 40WPM (or 30WPM), it will be friendly 
feature.

But take it as just only my opinion!

73 & all the best,
Goran(Goca),T98G ex.4N4AE
(Member of YU4EBL)
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Javier Remoto 
  To: towertalk@contesting.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, 05 January, 2005 9:04 PM
  Subject: [TowerTalk] yv5mbx - QSK question


  Hi,
  Maybe it sounds a dumb question but at least a question :)

  Santa Claus bring me a new radio that supports QSK and my amp support it 
either.

  My cw speed is low (abt 12 wpm) and I would like to know if there is any 
advantage through the use of QSK over non-QSK method.

  73's de Javier
  yv5mbx
  _______________________________________________

  See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless 
Weather Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any 
questions and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

  _______________________________________________
  TowerTalk mailing list
  TowerTalk@contesting.com
  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________

See: http://www.mscomputer.com  for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather 
Stations", and lot's more.  Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with any questions 
and ask for Sherman, W2FLA.

_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>