Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] another 160/80m rx loop question

To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] another 160/80m rx loop question
From: <donovanf@starpower.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:04:46 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
A simple loop antenna has a deep null broadside to the loop for vertically 
polarized signals only.  Its great for nulling local noise sources but 
completely ineffective for skywave propagated noise on 160 and 80 meters.   

A pennant or K9AY loop is a great solution, but a simple loop is not.

73
Frank
W3LPL

---- Original message ----
>Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:29:22 -0400
>From: r miles <greenacres113@charter.net>  
>Subject: [TowerTalk] another 160/80m rx loop question  
>To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
>
>I am considering a semi- commercial loop. Sold by a ham. 8' diamond for rx on 
>160m/80m. I'm using an OCF on 160m at 50' & an 80m half square now. My problem 
>is rx.I work what I hear but I would like to hear better.  I plan to put it on 
>a 5-6' tower & rotate it. I'd use a pre-amp. This will go to my K3.
>...
>What I'm asking is anyone using a rx diamond [pvc with coax inside & a 
>matching network]? What do you use as a pre -amp? Anyone rotating theirs? A 
>pennant or large wire loop is impractical in my case. 8 towers,guys,2 mono 
>verticals and shrubbery is enough to mow around. I want as simple as possible  
>rx loop.
>k9il
>_______________________________________________
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TowerTalk mailing list
>TowerTalk@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>