Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Trees and Beams

To: towertalk@contesting.com, wb0m@flashdog.us
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Trees and Beams
From: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:28:13 EDT
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
 
In a message dated 7/13/2009 12:02:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
towertalk-request@contesting.com writes:

>  Does anyone have any guess on what would be the minimum  distance from  
the branches and leaves and from the trunk of a tree  to avoid major  
disruption of a signal from a beam antenna up about  30 feet? The tree  
is a silver maple about 50 feet high.
 
    What's a "disruption"? 
 
    You've got 2 considerations: electrical and  mechanical.
 
    Electrically if it's for HF, leaves and such  don't seem to exhibit any 
negatives. For VHF and up, there is probably some  signal loss as it goes 
thru wet leaves, trunks, etc. I don't know what the  magnitude is but I 
suspect it's slight.
 
    Mechanically any rotatable antenna should be  mounted at the top of the 
topped tree in the clear so it'll turn. At that  point you're above any 
branches so it's a moot point. 
 
    You should leave some branches at the top to keep  drawing sap up but 
they do grow and you'll need to do some pruning every 3-4  years to keep 
those little sucker branches from stopping the antenna dead in  its tracks. 
It's 
amazing how much force they can exert. 
 
Cheers,
Steve      K7LXC
TOWER TECH



 
**************Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL Personals. 
(http://personals.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntuslove00000003)
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>