Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Time for a Real Tower Question TX-489

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Time for a Real Tower Question TX-489
From: K6OK via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: K6OK <jvarn359@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 20:32:50 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
TIA-222-G is silent on crankups. If any city or county won't accept a
retracted crankup as meeting code they are within their rights to do so
because there's no law, regulation or code to point to that says otherwise.
OTOH some local agencies prefer crankups. The lack of guidance in 222-G
causes this wide variation of acceptance, as you unfortunately experienced.

73 Jim K6OK


W3AHL wrote:
>> I live near Wilson, but in another county in NC, where they won’t even
consider
a permit based upon the condition that a tower would be retracted during a
storm.<<
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>