Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] F-connectors

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] F-connectors
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 07:33:09 -0400
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
"The primary reason for using F-connectors is that the CATV cables require 
crimp connectors, and F-connectors have dominated CATV/MATV because they are 
fairly inexpensive and very easy to install with the proper tools...73, Jim K9YC

Adding to Jim's point, the SNS F connector has two metallic pieces and there's 
no center pin to crimp.  Compare the complexity of the F to a BNC.  Now deploy 
a million of each type into a metro service area.  I can’t imagine the number 
of truck rolls needed if CATV/SAT companies depended on a BNC.   The broadband 
CATV companies rely on  the F up to 1 GHz and have been for the last 20+ years. 
 

Although not obvious, the mating female F center connection has advanced over 
the decades.  Early female Fs used a pair of leaf springs to maintain contact 
with the RG6 center conductor.  Modern Fs use a knuckled inner that applies 
equal spring force around the entire surface of the center conductor.  

The latest generation of SNS connectors contain an o-ring boot on the front of 
the rotating nut (e.g., PPC EX6WSPLUS).  As the F is tightened, the boot 
compresses against the mating surface.  When these SNS connectors are used with 
gel-flooded RG6, it makes for very reliable connections that need no attention 
for a long time.

For receive systems, the RG6 and SNS F combination is an excellent choice.  

Paul, W9AC 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>