True, but the rotator distributes the load among a much larger number of
ball bearings. The shape of the races in the TB3 make it clear it was
designed primarily for radial loads, not axial. Also, an "in tower"
rotator can be removed without taking the whole antenna system down.
Another thought occurred to me: With the thrust bearing bolts tightened
down, the system is overconstrained. That means that very high stresses
could occur if the two bearings systems aren't perfectly true as they
fight each other.
73,
Scott K9MA
On 5/5/2019 06:46, mike repinski via TowerTalk wrote:
Then the rotator gets the little marks. Can't win.
-----Original Message-----
From: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sat, May 4, 2019 9:39 pm
Subject: [TowerTalk] TB3 Postmortem
After nearly 30 years of holding up my TH7 and D40, the thrust bearing
was pretty rough. The T2X never had any trouble turning it, but I took
it apart to see what was going on. I found the surfaces of the two
aluminum pieces deeply indented by the ball bearings. It's scrap metal
now, but I wonder if the long periods I left the antenna in one position
might have made things worse. Would it have helped to just turn it once
a week or so? Or is such failure inevitable? After all, once the
bearings create the slightest indentation, they're going to always
settle into those positions, making them worse. I suppose one could
periodically take it down and smooth out the surfaces, but who is going
to bother with that? It lasted almost 30 years, so I got my money's worth.
Another possibility: Would it be better to leave the bearing set screws
slightly loose, so the rotator takes the vertical load?
73,
Scott K9MA
--
Scott K9MA
k9ma@sdellington.us
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|