Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vees

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted Vees
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:23:38 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 6/14/2020 7:03 PM, wesattaway wrote:
However,  as overall height is raised then best performance occurs when the wires are 
level.   I think Jim Briwn may have some data on this.

Hi Wes,

My study was on the effect of height on horizontal and vertical antennas, and I developed a figure of merit in dB for height of horizontal antennas. The executive summary is that for 30M and below, higher is better. :)

I didn't study inverted V rigging, but N6BT has and says that a "flat" dipole has a 3dB advantage over the inv V when the flat rigged at the same height as the center of the V.

Some other things I learned:
1) The only effect of soil QUALITY on horizontally polarized antennas is on their feedpoint impedance. 2) Height STONGLY affects the performance of horizontally polarized antennas. 3) Soil quality STRONGLY affects vertically polarized antennas -- the better the soil conductivity, the better they work.
4) HF verticals work better on the roof than on the ground.

The report on my work is here.  It has been peer reviewed.
http://k9yc.com/AntennaPlanning.pdf

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>