The answer to your question isn't simple, but HFTA will give you good
insight into the problem.
50 feet will give you decent radiation at almost all elevation angles
except for the very low ones (less than 5 to 8 degrees), but even from
Florida to Europe those low angles are important. 70 feet will give you
about 3 more dB at 5 degrees takeoff, but give you a deep notch at 31
degrees. 100 feet will give you about 6.5 db more than at 50 feet, but
will give you a deep notch at 21 degrees.
It is very easy to do this in HFTA. I'll send you a couple of plots for
illustration. The vertical purple bars represent the weighted
importance of the various angles for the listed destination from Florida
based upon the ARRL calculations for the distribution of the VOACAP
variable TANGLE (optimum takeoff angle) ... which probably shouldn't be
taken too literally since of the roughly 20 variables available for
analysis in VOACAP, its author has stated that TANGLE probably has the
least accuracy. Still, as far as I know it's the probably the best we
have at this point.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 7/14/2020 9:24 AM, Robert Gerace wrote:
Please forgive my inability to figure out how to search archives by subject as
I have to imagine this is a common question.
Understanding the best answer is “as high as possible” and the second best
answer is at least one wavelength...
I wanted to ask about some real world experience between 50’ and 66-70’...
Specifically: given the same antenna, same QTH, same general point in the solar
cycle...
Has anyone had a 20m monoband, trapless beam at ~50’, then raised it to ~70’
and seen enough consistent improvement to justify the effort?
Background:
Given my QTH I have about 55’ to tilt my (in process of permitting) tower. If I want to go
higher I’m clear to 70 easy. However it will require telescoping (e.g. lower to 55, then
tilt) to be able to service from the ground — a requirement for me.)
The cost difference is very substantial all the way around: purchase, shipping,
footing, installation).
So I’m wondering if it’s worth all the time and trouble to get an extra 15-20
feet?
Background: I’d like a big signal, would like to have at least a 50-75% chance to bust
most pileups... even if it takes patience...but I’m a casual DXer who after 44 years
is getting serious about 20m CW DXCC.
I’m not trying to be the guy who is first through the pileup or even places in a DX
contest... but I’m tired of being the guy who can only reach for low hanging fruit. I
want to work some more dopamine inducing DX and maybe turn in something more than average on
contests.
I live in NE FL, a mile from the beach, on very sandy soils, and have oak trees at
45’.
Any insight appreciated.
Thanks es 73
Bob
KD4Q
Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|