WriteLog
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [WriteLog] Writelog-CT17-Radios

To: w5xd@writelog.com
Subject: Re: [WriteLog] Writelog-CT17-Radios
From: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Richard Zalewski <dick.w7zr@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 10:48:06 -0700
List-post: <mailto:writelog@contesting.com>
I will admit first that I am getting in over my head.  But....I have
been viewing the activity of the CI-V, 775, and PW-1 using DF4OR CI-V
test.  The reason I don't think we are having a problem with the CI-V
and just the 775 is that there is no strobing of data with that set
up.  However as soon as you turn on the PW-1, the 775 is queried by
the PW1 for mode.  PW1 sends out an 04 command and then the 775 sends
back its mode and filter.  This happens every 10 seconds.  So if we
try to capture a spot during all of this activity then a collision
occurs.

So you experts, how far off am I?

Dick


On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 11:30:08 -0700, Richard Zalewski
<dick.w7zr@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wayne,
> 
> Is there some sort of stacking register that cleared when you make a
> change to the program for example if you change the port setup in any
> way?  The thing I notice is when I make a change and come back to test
> the problem it works for the first few spots and then goes back to the
> original problem.
> 
> Dick
> 
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:30:35 -0000, W. Wright, W5XD <w5xd@writelog.com> wrote:
> > >No solution to your problem, but get the same thing regarding "No
> > >Rig".  Unfortunately, once the "No Rig" shows up it stays until the Port
> > >Window is pulled down and selecting OK.  Then the radio is once again
> > >recognized.  The radio is an IC746 using a homemade CAT interface.  This
> > >problem only occurs with Writelog.  >>
> > >
> > >For what it may be worth, here is my experience. I have a home brew
> > interface
> > >with a 756 Pro. It worked perfectly with Windows 95. When I installed
> > Windows
> > >98SE, I would frequently get the same condition as Mike explains above and
> > >could "fix" the same way. Now that I'm running XP professional, everything
> > >works perfectly again. The only change was the OS.  Go figure.   I only run
> > WL, so
> > >don't know about any other applications.
> >
> > I suspect this is caused by the number-of-stop-bits setting WL is
> > using when setting up the COM ports. Way back since about 1991, WL
> > has set all COM ports for rig control to 2 stop bits. But certain
> > combinations of OS, COM port hardware (USB? or on motherboard?),
> > and rig don't work properly with 2. You can change an INI setting
> > to tell WL to use 1 stop bit on a comm port. From the [RIGS] topic
> > in the WL online help:
> >
> > The COMn:= settings in [RIGS], as of version 10.41, are used for rig control
> > (only)âbut just to control the baud rate and number of stop bits. WriteLog
> > always sets no parity and 8 bit characters for rig control, regardless of
> > the COMn: settings.
> >
> > COM1:=9800,n,8,1,
> > COM2:=4800,n,8,2,
> >
> > That very last digit is the number-of-stop-bits. Try creating a [RIGS]
> > section
> > in your INI file and set stop-bits to 1.
> >
> > Wayne
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WriteLog mailing list
> > WriteLog@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
> > WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/
> >
> 
> --
> Tnx es 73
> Dick W7ZR
> 


-- 
Tnx es 73
Dick W7ZR
_______________________________________________
WriteLog mailing list
WriteLog@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/writelog
WriteLog on the web:  http://www.writelog.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>