[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [RFI] FCC Non-compliant Battery Chargers;rfi-bounces not a 'bounce"?

To: "rfi" <rfi@contesting.com>,"EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Subject: RE: [RFI] FCC Non-compliant Battery Chargers;rfi-bounces not a 'bounce"?
From: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 6:7:15 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>

To answer your questions in order, yes it might mean that - but only if
they didn't actually test. I suspect Vector got snookered.  "What FCC test?
You never say that! Hwa-aah!"  What you don't test, they won't DO.

Second, I notice that the RFI list posts I am getting via mail now are
indeed from rfi-bounces. However, looking at
I see the posts I am getting this way ARE making it to the contesting.com
RFI list archives.


> [Original Message]
> From: EDWARDS, EDDIE J <eedwards@oppd.com>
> To: rfi <rfi@contesting.com>; <ka5s@earthlink.net>
 > Date: 12/11/2003 5:43:23 AM
> Subject: RE: [RFI] FCC Public Notice on Non-compliant Battery Chargers
> Cortland,
> So does this mean that all those vendors who claim compliance with Part
> 15 might well be in violation of the Comm Act of '34 sections mentioned
> below? =20
> I also noticed your msg was via rfi-bounces@contesting.com on your
> behalf.  I haven't been able to post to the rfi-list for months now.
> Everything bounces or is refused but never gets posted.  Has this been
> happening to you as well?  Be interesting to see if this one goes thru
> or not.
> 73,
>  de ed -K0iL

RFI mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [RFI] FCC Non-compliant Battery Chargers;rfi-bounces not a 'bounce"?, Cortland Richmond <=