Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@kk9a.com: 445 ]

Total 445 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:07:07 -0500
If you want to maximize your QSOs you should not be just listening to a single radio waiting for a station to ID. Sprint is a completely different contest which has a QSY rule. It is not reasonable t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00213.html (9,250 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:18:42 -0500
Ward, I also agree that a running station should send his callsign frequently. Frequently does not mean ID after every QSO, if you have a quick running pileup. Sometimes an op can catch two callsigns
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00235.html (11,034 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 23:18:49 -0500
Ward, I also agree that a running station should send his callsign frequently. Frequently does not mean ID after every QSO, if you have a quick running pileup. Sometimes an op can catch two callsigns
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00237.html (10,887 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 12:17:49 -0500
Bill, you are confusing peak per minute rates with average hourly rates. Doing the rates LY8O stated for one minute is very possible, even for me. Keeping this pace for 60 minutes is something only N
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00034.html (9,155 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 07:15:49 -0500
If this needs to be in the rules, IDing at least once a minute seems reasonable. The good ops will continue to ID more frequently as the pileup conditions allow and the bad ones will just have to not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00039.html (9,108 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:41:43 -0500
Wrong! The FCC rule says nothing about identifying after every contact. Section 97.119(a) provides that an amateur station ?must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting channel at the end
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00077.html (9,105 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sometimes, even sending your call every time doesn't help.. (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:24:27 -0500
What is the purpose of publicly listing everyone that miscopied your callsign? This is a contest where a station has a limited time to put as many stations in their log as possible. While we all try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00119.html (20,467 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] update from NQ4I ice storm 2014 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 22:05:59 -0500
Sorry to hear this Rick. I am sure it is heartbreaking to watch after investing much time and money into building the station. I am also getting the snow and freezing rain here in Charlotte, NC and w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00154.html (8,331 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] Fw: KLM parts needed (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 22:31:50 -0500
Does KLM use this style bracket on their 40m beams? I use them on 20m and 15m. John KK9A Rick, DX Engineering sells a stronger substitute. See http://www.dxengineering.com/parts/dxe-beb-1 I have used
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00199.html (7,124 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 08:14:57 -0500
I think most contests only allow one transmitted signal at a time for single operator. You have to read the rules carefully. I ran two radios in the WPX RTTY contest earlier this month and sometimes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00223.html (8,156 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] It wasn't a QSO... Or was it? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:31:10 -0500
Who is giving this advice? I personally dislike someone withholding the exchange. With the exception of RTTY, if I hear someone giving their callsign before the exchange I assume that I have it incor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00272.html (7,891 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] It wasn't a QSO... Or was it? (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:54:02 -0500
Since this is the CQ-Contest list I was referring to contest operations. If you try and correct a miscopied callsign and the op refuses to do so, you will still get credit for the QSO. The rules are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00280.html (10,913 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Headset Boom Mic. (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 13:31:15 -0500
I was not aware that Heil discontinued the HC-4 element! The Proset 4 has been a favorite of mine for many many years. It looks like the shelves have been pick clean of any remaining elements and Pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00320.html (8,722 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] W/VE contacts from W/VE in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:42:06 -0500
I also said CQ DX in my contest CQ, unfortunately this does not stop the U.S. callers. John KK9A I agree with Gerry. I work anyone and everyone regardless. I heard one OP at K3LR calling "CQ DX" in h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00030.html (8,521 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] W/VE contacts from W/VE in ARRL DX (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:24:25 -0500
I spent many hours from P40A running Europe outside the US phone bands. A number of US stations still worked me. John KK9A Being from a somewhat rare call area I literally have to hide outside the US
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00034.html (9,415 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] score.r5ga.com CLOSED (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 16:27:01 -0500
Is this permanently closed? I also really enjoyed Valery's excellent contest claimed scores site. The pictures from his travels on his site are also very nice. John KK9A Guys, I'm really sad to see t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00044.html (7,691 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Magazine Continuance (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 09:56:50 -0400
The May issue could be a long wait. So far this year I have not received any 2014 issues of CQ Magazine. John KK9A I don't speak for CQ Magazine, but I got permission to relay the following. The curr
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00114.html (7,699 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments requested on the Mosley Pro-96-S yagi (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:19:53 -0400
This may be better suited for towertalk. There are many good antennas and rotators to choose from. Regarding the controller, I have six Green Heron control boxes currently in use and I could not be h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-03/msg00218.html (8,502 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] The two/four-point rule in WPX (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:10:13 -0400
There is no way to make contesting fair. Changing north american contacts back one point would make it more unfair for stations in the Caribbean to compete with stations in South America. John KK9A B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00121.html (9,297 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] The two/four-point rule in WPX (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:48:12 -0400
Since the subject line refers to the WPX contest you get one point for same country 2300 mile QSO in your example. John KK9A To: cq-contest@contesting.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The two/four-point
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00137.html (10,542 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu