Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nss@mwt.net: 803 ]

Total 803 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:10:00 -0500
So a Quad, with a single boom (obviously) all interlaced, that can operate on 20-15-10, but has seperate feedlines does not fit, but if it had a remote coax switch it would? or would it not still sin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00075.html (12,958 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU log checking report (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 09:18:53 -0500
But what about the people that log it thinking what it should be, and then other logging it what was actually sent.? I have this problem in the IARU HF test. probably 10% of my contacts are arguments
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00076.html (8,402 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] TB-wires WPX category (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 18:19:33 -0500
So a quad even if it's only a two element spider like quad will not qualify. I actually don't know how to fix this.,, Maybe go by the amount of gain? i dunno, Joe WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00090.html (8,942 bytes)

104. [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 23:06:42 -0500
Just Curious. Has anyone or does anyone, use a spotting cluster during Field Day? Trying to get some newbie contesters to play with different things. Joe -- The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00110.html (6,438 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:29:25 -0500
That's what I was wondering,,, I always use Field Day as a gateway to get people into contesting. Seems people are willing to try something new during FD, but never any other time. and yeah it won't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00113.html (9,410 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 08:35:25 -0500
No these guys are die hard Feild day op's Been since the 70's almost every Fd thay have done. so many are actually decent contesters, but most won't even try other actual contests. Sad some are prett
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00119.html (9,891 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] AO8HQ vs DA0HQ - ARRL did the worse in two decisions (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:32:23 -0500
or make it like Field day rules, all stations and antennas withinn 1000 feet or whatever the distance is. Joe WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com _
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00142.html (12,640 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:18:16 -0500
Thing is, a kid with these skills did not need the bells and whistles of all the fancy stuff to make it fun! Being a new person to contesting, and even on SSB if it's soo new and strange that they ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00153.html (9,504 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:22:38 -0500
Yup that's the plan, Maybe also have CW GET or Skimmer running for the less proficient CW ops too. Now heres a question,, Playing with the set up here. I of course need to filter the spots. It was su
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00154.html (8,979 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Field Day (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:01:24 -0500
Hi Gary, No what the problem was it wouldn't take the pass K & VE first. it would pass everything. it took about three of four tries for it to take for some reason. But once it took i left it run for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00175.html (12,039 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day and contesting... (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:27:50 -0500
I'm pretty sure I remembered that also, But was too chicken to say anything about it. Radical thoughts like that has gotten me in trouble here before. Joe WB9SBD The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00344.html (12,174 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] [SPAM] IARU HF zones (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:22:18 -0500
Good point! COPY WHATS SENT!!! Especially with me. I want to play in this test. I have loved this test since my beginnings as a Novice doing this test. It was my first DX contest as a Ham, and Still
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00073.html (10,415 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF zones (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 19:09:49 -0500
Yup Zone 7 for me, 07 W-K-N-A U.S.A. (N. Dakota, S. Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa, Minnesota, that part of Utah& Arizona East of 110 Deg. W.,& that pa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00083.html (13,773 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:20:35 -0500
[snip] Agreed! Good "Mic" work is just as much a skill as good CW work! You can hear them all the same strength, yet one guy sounds hurried and un organized, yet the other seems relaxed to the point
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00168.html (10,528 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spotting (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 11:12:39 -0500
Can we say Cubs? Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00173.html (8,238 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or multi op.? (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 09:47:20 -0500
I'd like to see a like Field Day B class two person. for us old timers that are getting too old to stay up and run a full contest anymore. Yet don't have enough local interest to be a true multi op s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00199.html (11,760 bytes)

117. [CQ-Contest] WRTC stations (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 07:55:00 -0500
How far apart, (close together) were all the stations. The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle Tyme Idle-Tyme.com http://www.idle-tyme.com _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mail
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00225.html (8,495 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reasonable expections... was Cheerleaders and the impact (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:37:03 -0500
I like this one,, But the general rules for ARRL contests say that "3.2.All callsigns and exchange information must be sent, received, acknowledged and logged correctly by each station for a complete
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00231.html (10,890 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:52:55 -0500
With this thinking, That means prior to the 80's there would have been no contesting? Because there is no spotting? _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00271.html (12,130 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] Spots and Success in the WRTC - a little data for discussion (score: 1)
Author: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 17:32:20 -0500
How about if the charaters remain the same speed, but they are spaced farther apart, slower WPM, yet the charaters are the same. would that effect these things? Ive done that many times when someone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00359.html (10,432 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu