Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nss@mwt.net: 803 ]

Total 803 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:12:25 -0600
That I can also live with, BUT One more question,, what happen to all the QSO's that are the equivalent of random QSO's that happen on any other contest where the other station is NOT in the test, an
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00122.html (9,198 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:26:14 -0600
I know (or at least I have been informed) that people from CQ monitor this board. but does the heads of ARRL contesting do it too? and what are their thoughts on all these comments? Joe WB9SBD *The O
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00146.html (9,861 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rookie Contest (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:28:39 -0600
I've been cob=ntesting for since 75, and the last years WI QSO Party was my first entry using a computer to log and submit my entry. Now here is someone that has been contesting for a LONG time and w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00148.html (10,641 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rookie Contest (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:37:14 -0600
And this is your problem WHY? If they do not submit it correctly, just like a paper log would have been hey dude you did irt wrong, your entry is trashed. try to do it right next time? Again if it is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00149.html (22,765 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rookie Contest (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:38:13 -0600
That's why we are thinking of how to suggest to fix obvious flaws because there still is time to fix it. *The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle-Tyme.com * _____________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00151.html (9,860 bytes)

66. [CQ-Contest] Rookie Roundup (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:40:39 -0600
Unless I'm missing something, is this only going to be a single op class contest? I don't see the possibility of a multi op class? It would be nice to have a group effort of beginners. Like a bunch o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00168.html (7,072 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Rookie Contest querie, (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:43:11 -0600
The rules copied here, 1. *Time Period, Modes, and Frequencies:* 1. 2.1 Time period: The third Sunday of April, August and December from 1800 UTC through 2359 UTC. 2010: 18 April, 15 August, 19 Decem
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00169.html (7,887 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting On Line - Used to be Rookie Roundup Scoring (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:06:13 -0600
Agreed, Give at least 24 hours? Oh well,, I guess I'm in the minority on most of this. I see at least in my home situation here that if something like this happens across all contests I guess my days
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00176.html (10,672 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Rookie Contest--submitting contacts in real time? (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:19:47 -0600
Which makes one wonder what they are referring to? Because N1MM is not even ready to do the contest. Joe WB9SBD _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00188.html (7,350 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] Computer Controlled Rigs. (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:17:10 -0600
Has anyone made a list of all the rigs that can be computer controlled? I'm going to be in the market to get a used rig, (new to me, I mean really new to me my rig now is a Drake TR-4!) But If I'm go
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00238.html (7,285 bytes)

71. [CQ-Contest] Is Getscores Toast? (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:26:52 -0600
I'm not in the contest this weekend, but wanted to see how everyone is doing, and I've been trying for a few hours now but it keeps timing out with a error Server Error in '/' Application. -- /Timeou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00239.html (7,352 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Computer Controlled Rigs. (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:16:45 -0600
Thank You All for all this excellent information! Joe WB9SBD *The Original Rolling Ball Clock Idle-Tyme.com * _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00261.html (11,569 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] RX Heresy? (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:15:14 -0600
In the old days (late 70's) I remember the old Drake B line was the contesters choice because it beat anything else that was out there for strong signal rejection. It even beat it's next generation C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-02/msg00372.html (9,191 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Edges (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 10:25:40 -0600
In my first days of contesting I remember people getting OO notices after a contest for stufflike this. Does the OO system even exist anymore I haven't heard any thing about them in decades! Joe WB9S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00105.html (8,821 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reminder - Inside the CQ WPX Contest Webinar (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:40:13 -0600
Will they archive this one as usual and announce when it's ready for viewing? I'll be busy with one of the most fun contests I do each year at that time the Wisconsin QSO Party. Joe WB9SBD The Origin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00186.html (8,132 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] WI QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:10:06 -0500
I'm taking a stab here. I had a newly licensed guy try the Wisconsin QSO Party last weekend. And he did great! So I want him to submit his log to the contest sponsor. Thing is on the website for the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00243.html (7,164 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:54:26 -0500
An awesome webinar that answers a lot of this can be downloaded and watched from the Potomic guys. http://www.casadelcrappo.com/pvrc/2009-08-05%2020.01%20Contest%20Antennas%20_%20DX%20or%20Domestic_%
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00265.html (13,261 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Going from 50 to 70 ft. (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:14:08 -0500
Don't let that stop ya! I was driving through a local town the other day and came across a station I just could not believe! Check it out what he has on this tiny average suburban sized lot that is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00266.html (8,315 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] Something we need to remember (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:00:48 -0500
yeah I heard several arguments this weekend, One i found really funny, I thought what a waste of time. These two guys somehow were both on the same freq. yelling at each other that they were on that
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00309.html (10,611 bytes)

80. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Calls (score: 1)
Author: Idle-Tyme <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:57:53 -0500
I wonder if there is more concrete rule on this? That's a little vague,, How about with club calls. Say a club is not as a club going to compete in a certain contest, but one of the members plans on
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00325.html (12,270 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu