Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Self\s+Spotting\s*$/: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Christopher Paulin" <chris@paulinslate.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:21:43 -0400
The ARRL contest committee made a very poor decision that was not well thought out by allowing self-spotting in their contests. The 2023 ARRL 10m contest rules read verbatim: "PROH.3. Arranging, soli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00082.html (8,653 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:44:56 -0600
Why? Nearly everyone on CW, RTTY and FT modes are spotted automatically to the clusters.  Technology does not exist yet to allow this on SSB.  If CW, RTTY and FT spots are good, then SSB spots should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00083.html (12,833 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 11:19:21 -0700
I'm a member of the Contest ADVISORY Committee representing the Pacific Division. We CAN NOT make decisions, only recommendations to another body within ARRL. THEY make the decisions, and they often
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00084.html (8,755 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Christopher Paulin" <chris@paulinslate.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 23:16:52 -0400
Jim K9YC, understood thanks. What body within the ARRL made the final decision? Mike W0MU, there Is a whole lot to unpack from your questions, most of have already been answered earlier in this threa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00085.html (9,931 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bourque <pbourque@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:24:32 -0400
HI Chris, I've been over these looking for inconsistencies, and yes, this is inconsistent with self spotting being allowed. The word soliciting should be removed from the language there. The text of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00086.html (10,365 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: PY2NY <py2ny.vitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:44:25 -0300
Jim, perfect, like always. 73 DX to everybody, super nice hiper good weekend from Jaboticabal SP Brasil . .. ... -- PY2NY / SP9NY / V26NY - Vitor Luis Aidar dos Santos http://military-jeep-brasil.blo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00087.html (17,334 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: kq2m@kq2m.com
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 20:47:16 -0500
Hi Paul, Not to change the subject but, if "All required elements of a contact must be exchanged via amateur radio.", then how do contacts made via remote qualify? Is the internet considered to be Am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00089.html (12,010 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Paul Bourque <pbourque@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:57:20 -0400
Control of the transmitter via remote control is allowed. Remote operation is just like an extended mic cord. The contact is to be made from one radio to another radio, regardless of the control meth
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00090.html (13,474 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Kevan Nason <knason00@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:25:31 -0400
Can't argue that losing the internet gives others an advantage. How is that any different than if your antenna balun burned up, thunderstorms took you off the air for a few hours, or you had to quit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00091.html (10,262 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "dj7ww@t-online.de" <dj7ww@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 07:49:34 +0100 (CET)
Best is to transfer all contesting into the Internet if leveling of the playing field is required. 73 Peter Can't argue that losing the internet gives others an advantage. How is that any different t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00092.html (9,755 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 01:56:51 -0700
Bob, What matters are (1) who built the station and (2) the RF path between transmitter and receiver, which includes their antennas. The location of the transmitter and those antennas determines the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00093.html (11,225 bytes)

132. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Tim Shoppa <tshoppa@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:14:28 -0400
I do note that the phrase "solicit contacts" is used once in the CQWW rules and there seems to be synonymous with "call CQ". Over tens of thousands of words in a dozen emails with me in fall of 2022,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00096.html (8,772 bytes)

133. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 08:34:01 -0600
Guest ops/hired guns to super stations or any station should have their own class too?  Do we really want to alienate people like N6MJ who has stated on many occasions that he is hired gun, an amazin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00097.html (14,750 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting (score: 1)
Author: "Christopher Paulin" <chris@paulinslate.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:56:51 -0400
Hi Paul, thanks for your response. Doesn't self-spotting via the internet also count as "arranging" of contacts during a contest by use of non-amateur radio means? Seems like the word "arranging" sho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00098.html (9,104 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu