Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:eedwards@oppd.com: 267 ]

Total 267 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [RFI] RFI 160m (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:49:32 +0000
Yes, they do. Mike Gruber, W1MG, is the RFI engineer at ARRL Lab ( http://www.arrl.org/the-lab-staff ). http://www.arrl.org/radio-frequency-interference-rfi However, ever since Riley Hollingsworth. K
/archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00112.html (9,181 bytes)

202. [RFI] Reliant Energy RFI case information (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:47:38 +0000
While looking at the ARRL RFI web page earlier, I finally found the info about the Reliant Energy case from 2003. Interesting story. It's in this issue of The ARRL Letter: http://www.arrl.org/arrllet
/archives//html/RFI/2013-01/msg00116.html (7,298 bytes)

203. Re: [RFI] Ultra Sonics (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:20:02 +0000
If you haven't tried this yet--to get some directivity during your search, increase the frequency being used and decrease the receiver gain until you almost lose the signal. Then search again and rep
/archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00012.html (8,203 bytes)

204. Re: [RFI] TVI Question (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:44:03 +0000
Wouldn't an illegal amplifier used out of the designed bands emit more RF trash than if it were being properly used within the bands it's designed to operate? Of course, couple this with a susceptibl
/archives//html/RFI/2013-04/msg00031.html (9,179 bytes)

205. Re: [RFI] RFI, Power Company. (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 20:38:06 +0000
A word of caution: To a utility, there is a difference before "arching" and "sparking". If you have arching, the ham won't be the only person to call in the problem because everyone will probably be
/archives//html/RFI/2013-05/msg00069.html (9,296 bytes)

206. Re: [RFI] RFI, Power Company. (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:12:01 +0000
Very true Pete! If a ham knows it is arcing, call it in as arcing! But most hams do not go out and locate the source of their noise. They just call it in. If you call RFI in as arcing and it isn't, t
/archives//html/RFI/2013-05/msg00082.html (12,071 bytes)

207. Re: [RFI] What the Cellphone Industry Doesn't Want You to Know about Radiation Concerns (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:06:27 +0000
Thanks for sharing this David! Good to hear both sides. Most of us probably realize with the enormous numbers of people using cell phones for last 5-10 years or more--if these cell phones were causin
/archives//html/RFI/2013-06/msg00022.html (9,639 bytes)

208. Re: [RFI] RFI Identification Help (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:19:04 +0000
If you begin your search with a preconceived notion what it should be, you may walk right by the real source. Also do your very best to verify the noise source if you end up calling the utility out.
/archives//html/RFI/2013-11/msg00026.html (10,847 bytes)

209. Re: [RFI] FCC releases complaint info for Jan - Mar 13 (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:26:05 +0000
"Further, as I and others have noted, there are no existing mandates for control of radiated emissions below roughly 30 MHz." Not at the manufacturer level, but they do send out nice letters and an o
/archives//html/RFI/2013-11/msg00056.html (10,333 bytes)

210. Re: [RFI] DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:51:39 +0000
Technological snake oil has been around a long time, and won't ever go away. And Diathermy is still considered a 100 year old medical treatment, but you don't hear about it much anymore. Using it to
/archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00053.html (8,302 bytes)

211. Re: [RFI] RFI in the news (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 21:26:07 +0000
Speaking of cable TV systems, which is one of our main power line interference customers in town... I attended an IEEE meeting this week with a presentation on "Multicasting in Cognitive Radio Networ
/archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00067.html (10,998 bytes)

212. Re: [RFI] DigiKeyer II (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 21:39:38 +0000
I second the motion to absolutely avoid braid outdoors for any RF site for many reasons including external rectification issues from corrosion. We even avoid it indoors at our work comm sites. Commer
/archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00108.html (11,815 bytes)

213. Re: [RFI] Daisy-chain grounding [was DigiKeyer II] (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:06:27 +0000
Jim, Actually, you are correct in the sense that the R-56 grounding guidelines are not based on circuit board designs, but they are based on real world problems and experience on lightning protection
/archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00115.html (12,814 bytes)

214. Re: [RFI] grounding ... [was DigiKeyer II] (Dale) (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 16:25:56 +0000
Excellent point Mark! And thanks to Dale for answering all those questions this weekend. In R56 you are bound to find info that is close enough to what you need to do at you home ham shack. Also, for
/archives//html/RFI/2013-12/msg00122.html (10,375 bytes)

215. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:57:37 +0000
"When his outdoor lights timer goes ON, I am OFF." Just FYI. Automatic light timers can also generate noise all by themselves. We had one my wife bought for our Christmas lights that made noise all o
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00012.html (11,875 bytes)

216. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:18:19 +0000
One thing's for sure, if the FCC receives no RFI reports and the ARRL receives no RFI reports, nothing will be done because there is no RFI problem reported. FCC probably will not respond to an issue
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00034.html (10,140 bytes)

217. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:18:38 +0000
Dale, I agree with "squeaky wheels get the grease". That's why most posts are saying it's important to call or file RFI complaints with the neighbor first, then the FCC, ARRL, CPSC, NCIS or any other
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00079.html (13,940 bytes)

218. Re: [RFI] LED Bulbs (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 19:02:48 +0000
Dale, You may need to look at it a little differently. You are missing an opportunity to establishing a good working relationship where you are they technical guy who can "help" your neighbor resolve
/archives//html/RFI/2014-02/msg00084.html (16,689 bytes)

219. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 12:29:17 +0000
Using this logic, we should never have to call the fire department when our house catches fire because we aren't firemen. The FD should have inspected every wire or possible fire hazard before we mov
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00062.html (11,237 bytes)

220. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1)
Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:02:25 +0000
Hate to beat a dead horse, but just thinking outside the box a little on this Friday. Perhaps Dale's neighbor works for the mob? If that were the case, I also wouldn't want to anger the neighbor. ;-)
/archives//html/RFI/2014-03/msg00079.html (14,650 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu