Mail Archive Search: <+from:eedwards@oppd.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:eedwards@oppd.com: 267 ]

Total 267 documents matching your query.

61. [RFI] Which Radio Shack phone is RFI resistant? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 12:41:23 -0600; Some have claimed that their $19.95 trimline phone is RFI resistant, but I rcvd RFI on it just as bad as most. The RS/K-Comm filter knocked it down low enough to not be bothersome. The only RFI-proo; /archives//html/RFI/2000-11/msg00024.html (7,489 bytes)
62. [RFI] TVI Filters (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 08:11:12 -0500; Which type of filter are you interested in? It'll probably depend on the type of interference you are getting. TVI to the video, probably need a High pass. TVI or RFI to the audio, probably need Comm; /archives//html/RFI/2000-10/msg00017.html (7,631 bytes)
63. [RFI] HF SSB RFI on CATV Sound Only! (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:23:10 -0600; He could still "watch" football with the sound turned down! Couldn't he? ;^) I doubt that will help. It's probably due to audio rectification in the audio amplifier of the TV. The audio amp's transi; /archives//html/RFI/2000-10/msg00027.html (11,025 bytes)
64. [RFI] PC Speakers (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 10:18:56 -0500; Roger's suggestion is right on. Buy, if you don't already own, a good shielded set of speakers to take. If they pick up RF in the shack add ferrites. The trick here is which end of the speaker wire d; /archives//html/RFI/2000-09/msg00005.html (10,207 bytes)
65. [RFI] Line filter (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:09:52 -0500; Filing a complaint won't do any good since the FCC probably will not enforce Part 15 which is where these Non-intentional radiators are regulated or at least supposed to be. You might find someone a; /archives//html/RFI/2000-09/msg00015.html (18,265 bytes)
66. [RFI] Grounding the Operating Position (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 09:32:24 -0500; Hi Dave, Braid does give a large surface area for grounding, but todays comm stds are to not use braid in the grounding especially outdoors where you will get corrosion. The reason is when it starts; /archives//html/RFI/2000-09/msg00016.html (8,929 bytes)
67. [RFI] Grounding the Operating Position (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 10:32:13 -0500; Actually, #4 AWG would be better if the run is over 8' long and #2 if over 16' long. And that's either bare OR w/green insulation. Solid or stranded is OK. Be sure to use copper rated connectors to; /archives//html/RFI/2000-09/msg00017.html (8,045 bytes)
68. [RFI] Line filter (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:54:11 -0500; Regarding my earlier message, some have pointed out that I was rather negative with respect to calling the FCC. I'm not saying that you shouldn't try calling the FCC if it indeed comes to that, but i; /archives//html/RFI/2000-09/msg00019.html (9,006 bytes)
69. [RFI] 2.4 GHz Phones (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2000 08:44:20 -0500; I have found drastic differences in susceptibility depending only on where a particular phone is plugged in within my house. The differences in wiring can make one phone more susceptible than others.; /archives//html/RFI/2000-08/msg00002.html (8,708 bytes)
70. [RFI] FW: TV set RFI questions (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 09:14:18 -0500; Below is an example of why RFI is such a problem for consumers. This is a response by Panasonic to my questions about TV RFI. Even TV manufacturer's don't seem to understand the problem, or at least; /archives//html/RFI/2000-07/msg00010.html (10,604 bytes)
71. [RFI] question regarding Carrier furnace (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:36:18 -0500; A rcvr will tell you if it makes noise. That is important, especially for DXers or contesters. But do you also transmit? Kinda hard to set-up, but that's the other half of the EMI problem when it co; /archives//html/RFI/2000-07/msg00018.html (8,422 bytes)
72. [RFI] Re: Code Enforcer (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:37:42 -0500; In light of the recent posts about the Code Enforcer. Here's some info on a case in NJ over RFI problems resulting in a neighbor trying to stop a ham's xmissions using the courts. I think the respons; /archives//html/RFI/2000-04/msg00004.html (10,056 bytes)
73. [RFI] Phone RFI filter (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:23:59 -0600; I always wondered what was in them. I could see the toroid thru the holes in the case, but not much else. Not much else to see I guess. Tnx Pete, for tearing yours open and saving us the trouble! ;^); /archives//html/RFI/2000-03/msg00006.html (7,996 bytes)
74. [RFI] What next? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:16:41 -0600; [Ed-K0iL] Hi Ed; I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think you're "entitled" to recover full costs in every state or every case. It may depend on how the judge rules in the case. I know of a ham who found; /archives//html/RFI/2000-02/msg00001.html (8,139 bytes)
75. FW: [RFI] Telephone Crosstalk? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 08:36:43 -0600; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html Submissions: rfi@contesting.com Administrative requests: rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com Questions: owner-rfi@contesting.com; /archives//html/RFI/2000-02/msg00008.html (8,275 bytes)
76. [RFI] What next? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:08:25 -0600; [Ed-K0iL] Tnx for the comments guys, and as much as I like to hear (or see) someone tell me I'm correct I think we're drifting a little off target now with comments relating to law. My only point in; /archives//html/RFI/2000-02/msg00010.html (7,686 bytes)
77. [RFI] Neon signs? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:08:37 -0600; Hi Bob, I don't have any experience with neon signs. I'd start by contacting the owners and find out who is the manufacturer of the signs. Then try calling the mfr for some help. They may have a fix; /archives//html/RFI/2000-01/msg00012.html (9,176 bytes)
78. [RFI] Neon signs? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2000 10:25:11 -0600; Okay, I should've looked this up first! The ARRL's "RFI: How 2 find it & fix it" book has a fix for Neon signs and it's not ferrites! The ARRL's RFI books are excellent resources for many EMI problem; /archives//html/RFI/2000-01/msg00013.html (8,295 bytes)
79. [RFI] Line Noise (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 09:20:46 -0600; [Ed-K0iL] Is your portable equipment listening on 80M or some other freq? Line noise intensity and propagation is variable depending on the frequency you are listening on. The higher you go in freq,; /archives//html/RFI/2000-01/msg00017.html (13,589 bytes)
80. [RFI] What next? (score: 1): Author: EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com (EDWARDS, EDDIE J); Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:57:46 -0600; --snip-- [Ed-K0iL] My response to her at that point would be this: "The problem IS your telephone since telephones are NOT supposed to nor designed to receive any radio signals! It IS operating defe; /archives//html/RFI/2000-01/msg00030.html (15,916 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]