Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:plaws@plaws.net: 430 ]

Total 430 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [RTTY] ARRL and band/mode awards (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 15:03:37 -0500
Mentioned, yes, but not that you can get it for every conceivable "sub mode" of phone. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00002.html (7,240 bytes)

322. Re: [RTTY] 300hz or 500hz IF filter? (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:56:39 -0500
Chen will chime in, I'm sure, and will have the most accurate answer, but I think the "optimal" width for 45.45-baud 170-Hz shift RTTY is 350 Hz. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by T
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-08/msg00078.html (7,999 bytes)

323. Re: [RTTY] BARTG 75 Baud Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2013 20:41:36 -0500
Just got a RigExpert and it looks like the baud setting for FSK is a jumper ... but ... I only need to short one set of header pins to go from 45.45 to 75. Thought about a little latching SPST pushbu
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00043.html (7,842 bytes)

324. [RTTY] 75 Baud ... RigExpert ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 21:05:06 -0500
Figured I'd start here. Want to play in 75-baud BARTG tomorrow. Have a new Rigexpert TI5 which supports FSK. The problem is that the TI5 uses different fake com ports for PTT and FSK. It does this by
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00060.html (7,994 bytes)

325. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud ... RigExpert ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 21:38:28 -0500
Fabi brought that same point to my attention. I have an extra week! :-) _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listi
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00062.html (7,527 bytes)

326. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud ... RigExpert ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 21:44:42 -0500
So, long story short ... MMTTY does not send FSK through the RigExpert TI-5 unless you use the EXTFSK DLL, which means no 75 baud. This despite VE3KI's much appreciated off-list help. It will send FS
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00072.html (13,406 bytes)

327. Re: [RTTY] 75 Baud ... RigExpert ... (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:14:34 -0500
I'm looking for potential SOFTWARE alternatives. If I were to keep the RigExpert, are there other SOFTWARE options I can use with N1MM for the 75-baud contest? Does 2tone transmit or is that just a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00075.html (16,329 bytes)

328. [RTTY] Never mind (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 12:45:40 -0500
Returning the RigExpert tomorrow. Spent the last 90 minutes trying to figure out how to install an old version of the FTDI drivers that Array Solutions says works. Despite getting familiar with pnput
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-09/msg00087.html (6,678 bytes)

329. [RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 15:58:22 -0500
I have simple requirements but I can't find a vendor that can meet them all. o single USB cable from PC to box o built-in sound device o single cable to radio (multiple heads for connections not on a
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00014.html (8,535 bytes)

330. Re: [RTTY] My first RTTY contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:20:34 -0500
Agree on all counts! Regarding running, I finally learned (well, "am learning") that the fact that you have a *full* 100 W and dipoles with questionable resonance (but handled by the tuner) makes lit
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00047.html (7,705 bytes)

331. Re: [RTTY] Looking for an interface - a few simple requirements (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:22:43 -0500
Talk to Chen and he'll explain it to you. :-) Not true. You can take open source code and, depending on the license, redistribute a modifed-yet-crappy version, but those are caught quickly (and, in m
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00097.html (9,988 bytes)

332. Re: [RTTY] Makrothen contest (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 14:13:03 -0500
First run with the Digi Keyer and had a good time, too, for the brief period I was on. I love how the score is calculated - work a couple of JAs and, boy, does it shoot up! :-) I'll make a point to d
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00200.html (7,337 bytes)

333. Re: [RTTY] Semi-rare one (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:36:23 -0500
Saw you work him a few minutes before I did. Had KG4 confirmed, but only on phone, 10 and 15. Believe that was the first time I'd made a contact using WW as the front end. -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | pla
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00216.html (6,750 bytes)

334. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:47:15 -0500
OK, help me (us) out here. The League will say "no, that's not what this is about" whether it is or not, so what could they point to to make what they say true? I share your concern about turning all
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00256.html (7,381 bytes)

335. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:24:29 -0500
Wow. Really? You know that the battle to retain ancient technology as a license requirement (not a mode, a license requirement) was lost over two decades ago, right? Anyhoo ... Now then, when a (US)
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00284.html (10,200 bytes)

336. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:16:45 -0500
You have to be very clear here. As a matter of regulation, I cannot operate phone at 28100 kHz. As a matter of "band plan", I can't operate RTTY at 28010 kHz. The latter has no regulatory standing di
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00297.html (9,003 bytes)

337. Re: [RTTY] ARRL Symbol rate proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 12:22:31 -0500
I passed the old Element 4B twice, in 1996 and again in 2000. Both times, I tried Element 1C but just never made it. Cashed in the 4B for the Amateur Extra in April of 2000 as soon as the rules chang
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-10/msg00298.html (10,863 bytes)

338. Re: [RTTY] Digital modes on this reflector (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 15:16:43 -0600
Even if they are inferior to RTTY? Well, I never .... -- Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train! _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00017.html (7,544 bytes)

339. Re: [RTTY] What to do about ARRL's Baud Rate Proposal (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:05:56 -0600
I communicate with my Div Dir regularly, but I don't expect to contact him on this matter. I am in the West Gulf Division. :-) This is strategic, of course, as I would rather stay silent on this and
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00122.html (7,918 bytes)

340. Re: [RTTY] ARRL attack on current RTTY users (score: 1)
Author: Peter Laws <plaws@plaws.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:17:33 -0600
It seems like I just saw an article about this very topic, Kai. Where, oh where might that have been? :-D I think that this is what bothers me the most. "Harmonize" isn't the right word here, I don't
/archives//html/RTTY/2013-11/msg00123.html (11,788 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu