- 41. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1)
- Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 17:01:50 -0700
- It could be doing that to give the receiver a chance to achieve phase lock? (Unless the modem is trying to transmit an RSID, which is really silly for PSK31.) Being a phase shift keyed mode, the PSK3
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00152.html (11,517 bytes)
- 42. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1)
- Author: aflowers@frontiernet.net
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 01:06:10 +0000 (UTC)
- As an experiment, "someone" just downloaded the source off of AE4JY's site, hacked the preamble and postamble arrays to two bytes each (they're set to be the same length because this someone was lazy
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00153.html (10,605 bytes)
- 43. Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question) (score: 1)
- Author: "G. E. Janssens - K5WW" <k5ww@live.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:29:06 -0500
- Years ago there was an option in N1MM Logger to not send the squelch tail. What a joy that was. I believe that option was taken away after Rick started using MMVari, instead of Joe's dll. A real bumm
- /archives//html/RTTY/2012-06/msg00155.html (9,317 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu