Mail Archive Search: <+from:Rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:04:14 -0400 (EDT); Jerry, I've never had a Corsair, but know what you mean. In the 1980s my main HF radio was the FT-102/FV-102DM. The receiver was better with the digital VFO switched out. 73 Ray. In a message dated 9; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00127.html (14,484 bytes)
122. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:34:52 -0400 (EDT); Good pointt, Joel. Even within the top group, there are big differences in sub receivers, e.g. the Orion's is general coverage while the K3 is ham band only with better performance. Ye pays yer money; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00140.html (14,847 bytes)
123. Re: [TenTec] OII VOX settings (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:04:29 -0400 (EDT); FWIW, my VOX settings for the 707 mic are VOX trip level 5%, ANTI-VOX 20% and VOX hang 0.60. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/16/2011 4:56:13 P.M. GMT Standard Time, natan1945@gmail.com writes: John,; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00297.html (8,683 bytes)
124. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:49:09 -0400 (EDT); John, Since you mention an Orion III, what is planned for it besides the RX366? 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/27/2011 12:55:07 P.M. GMT Standard Time, jhenry@tentec.com writes: Current plan is, th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00445.html (8,879 bytes)
125. Re: [TenTec] new RX366 sub receiver (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 11:30:28 -0400 (EDT); John, Understood. Thanks for the info, and I'll await more details on the RX366. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/27/2011 3:25:29 P.M. GMT Standard Time, jhenry@tentec.com writes: I was only using th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00447.html (8,889 bytes)
126. Re: [TenTec] Orion II question (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:05:24 -0400 (EDT); Phil, I'm using 2.044a, but many people are still using 2.039d. You can check the revision history on TT's web site to see if the changes are significant to you. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 9/29/2; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00482.html (7,379 bytes)
127. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 16:58:00 -0400 (EDT); Hi all, I agree with Gary: the operator makes a big difference. Our brains are all wired differently, but as a rather experienced weak-signal CW op I have difficulty with the notion that, at normal s; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00198.html (14,807 bytes)
128. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 19:57:19 -0400 (EDT); Jim, Yes, a scope can monitor a range of frequencies at the same time. The ear can't. Actually, I use the Orion II sweep display (v2.044a, set to 36 kHz) to do functions 1-3. It won't identify the st; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00203.html (10,686 bytes)
129. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 11:17:18 -0400 (EDT); Although Bill was writing about the original Orion, he has pretty well summed up the wish list for an Orion III (or Orion II MkII): 1. Sub RX identical to the main RX 2. First IF output with no user; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00212.html (10,621 bytes)
130. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Reviews (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:45:03 -0400 (EDT); John, I, too, can cut Rick some slack personally, but he was the reviewer of the Orion II who said he had difficulty with its operation because he was used to Icom. Rick was honest in his review; the; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00225.html (9,911 bytes)
131. Re: [TenTec] ORRION ll S Meter (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:05:32 -0400 (EDT); Ed, I don't have a calibrated generator, but I have noticed that with the preamp off, the S meter is "Scotch," but with the preamp on, it reads about the same as those of nearby hams with other high-; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00009.html (7,027 bytes)
132. Re: [TenTec] pan adapter (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:04:32 -0400 (EDT); John, I'm not sure which updates you are waiting for. I'd like to see a sub receiver equal to the main receiver, and would be willing to buy an O III to get it, if necessary. On the other.hand, I thi; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00107.html (8,399 bytes)
133. Re: [TenTec] 516 tuning rate (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 10:32:44 -0400 (EDT); I've had mine for 6 years, and it's a great driver for the 1208 transverter. Unlike a 100-watt rig, it won't blow the 1208 even if you goof and run full power. 73 Ray W2Rs In a message dated 7/30/201; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00195.html (8,252 bytes)
134. Re: [TenTec] Using Ten-Tec mics with Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 09:18:23 -0400 (EDT); Doug, I don't have an Omni VI+ but my main rig is also an Orion II. When I switched from an electret 706 to a dynamic 707, I had to move the H/W mic gain setting from 0 (default) to +12.0. With the 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00112.html (7,560 bytes)
135. Re: [TenTec] Using Ten-Tec mics with Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:57:25 -0400 (EDT); Right, Jim. Not omly did T-T benefit from Al Kahn's experience at E-V, but Bob Heil helped design the audio section of the O II. With a good mic like the 707, it sounds great. 73 Ray W2RS; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00115.html (7,378 bytes)
136. Re: [TenTec] Using Ten-Tec mics with Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:05:20 -0400 (EDT); Barry, You'll have to ask Bob, or John Henry. All I know is what Bob told me. 73 Ray W2RS; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00117.html (6,919 bytes)
137. Re: [TenTec] new radio (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:07:37 -0400 (EDT); An Orion replacement, eh? What features does John want to replace? 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/11/2011 9:13:39 P.M. GMT Standard Time, atrampler@att.net writes: Note that with the (re)acquisitio; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00062.html (9,499 bytes)
138. Re: [TenTec] new radio (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 08:34:44 -0400 (EDT); Well, it is "the SSB company" :-) John, glad you're keeping up with us users' feedback. I'll await what your team comes up with. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 5/12/2011 11:40:56 A.M. GMT Standard Ti; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00066.html (9,406 bytes)
139. [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:37:30 -0400 (EDT); I've had my O2 (fully loaded except for the antenna tuner) for 5+ years. With that experience in mind, I would like to see its successor have a sub receiver identical to the main rx, data outputs to; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00067.html (10,248 bytes)
140. Re: [TenTec] Orion III (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 12:35:14 -0400 (EDT); I am mostlly a CW operator, and find that the Orion II NR (v2.044A), with a wide (6 kHz) roofing filter (tnx Bob, K8IA, for that tip) does help pull out the weak ones on 160 and 80 meters. I don't ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00111.html (10,904 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]