Mail Archive Search: <+from:efricha@dimensional.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:efricha@dimensional.com: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] Orions, IC-7800s... (score: 1): Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 19:50:07 -0600; At 04:08 PM 5/21/2003 -0500, Art wrote: First, the IC-7800 is likely to be a beautiful rig, perfect for those who see more value in it than the cost (Thank you, Adam Smith). Maybe it will even have t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00797.html (8,677 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] DC Power Supply Backup (score: 1): Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 21:18:31 -0600; At 05:04 PM 5/21/2003 -1000, Ken Brown wrote: I do not know whether there is an "industry standard" for rating UPSs. It may be that every manufacturer has their own unique way of rating that cannot b; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00805.html (10,544 bytes)
43. Re: [TenTec] Arrow Antenna 146/437-10WBP users (score: 1): Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:24:20 -0600; I have not personally done it. However, Chuck, KI0AG, would put on a demo at almost any hamfest contacting AO27 with that antenna (or its predecessor which didn't break down into halves) and an HT. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00853.html (8,987 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Arrow Antenna 146/437-10WBP users (score: 1): Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>; Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 07:03:09 -0600; 5 Watts is fine. The duplexer that comes with some variants claims to be rated only to 10 Watts. 73 de Eric, KB0YDN Bob, KZ2G -- 10-10 # 10148 -- Omni 6 Plus (Base) & FT-100D (Wheelchair Mobile), C U; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00897.html (8,640 bytes)
45. Re: [TenTec] RX-320D (score: 1): Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:19:44 -0700 (MST); Just FYI, this is nearly identical to what the WinRadio G303 does -- it brings in a 12 kHz IF to your soundcard and does the rest in software. -- Eric F. Richards efricha@dimensional.com "The weird; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00008.html (9,634 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] RX-320D (score: 1): Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:53:39 -0700 (MST); All the radio controls are open source (www.linradio.com) *except the SDR*. In other words, no. :-) Don't know about the PCR1000. It's not one of my favorite radios because of both engineering and p; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00010.html (11,987 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] RX-320D (score: 1): Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards); Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 14:44:43 -0700 (MST); I am too, but my postings are delayed badly. Dunno why. Specifically the G303 or the others? The others weren't worth it. I can't quote chapter and verse, but as a radio it 's pretty mediocre. As a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00013.html (10,674 bytes)
48. Re: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB (score: 1): Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards); Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:57:39 -0600 (MDT); Jeez, you old folks need a yung'n like me (and a tech-minus to boot!) to remind you that before FM MPX stereo there were some that broadcast one channel on AM and the other on FM, and their AM tuner; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00489.html (12,668 bytes)
49. Re: [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1): Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 19:35:07 -0700; I'd like to throw my opinion in on this as well, but first a little background on me: I am a ham, but the time I spend in HF is spent listening. I primarily listen to utility/military stations, but I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00137.html (12,582 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1): Author: "Eric F. Richards" <efricha@dimensional.com>; Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 22:31:51 -0700; My fourty something year old ears (which are better than my memory of how old I am) can definitely tell the difference between a 10 Hz beat and a 1 Hz beat. Does it matter? Probably not for CW or SSB; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00143.html (10,127 bytes)
51. Re: [TenTec] Precision in Frequency displays (score: 1): Author: efricha@dimensional.com (Eric F. Richards); Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 07:39:04 -0700 (MST); No, but ECSS, as using SSB to receive AM signals is called, is sometimes your only option when you don't have a true synchronous AM -- one that phase-locks with the carrier -- available. Also, many; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00150.html (9,563 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 51
Page: [1] [2] [3]