Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:shristov@ptt.rs: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 02:04:00 +0200
5 mW, not 5 W. 73, Sinisa YT1NT
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00144.html (9,875 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 13:49:38 +0200
A perfect 16-bit ADC would have a difference of 97.8 dB between the average noise level and the level of the full-scale sinusoid. This is a basic fact, and it is NOT violated by ADCs used in SDR rece
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00153.html (10,846 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:06:11 +0200
As long as the quantization noise is not correlated with the signal, ADC will successfully convert signals much, much smaller than the quantization step. The noise effectively interpolates ADC steps
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00179.html (11,188 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:59:18 +0200
Yes, it is. Yes, that's the essence of it. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00188.html (10,157 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OT: Dynamic range of SDR Radios with 16-bit DAC (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 01:21:54 +0200
That is another matter. Dithering removes nonlinear effects of ADC steps, but it does not remove other forms of nonlinearities. Due to ADC nonlinearities (other than quantization steps), some distort
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00190.html (9,277 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:51:00 +0200
Filters like those have trouble in achieving 40 dB attenuation in the next/previous ham band. At +/- 750 kHz (or +/- 1.5 MHz) attenuation is practically non-existing. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00209.html (9,594 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:15:04 +0200
Hi Rick, that's what I had in mind. Taking the 7 MHz filter as an example, there is 40 dB attenuation on ~3.5 MHz. But on 6 MHz the attenuation is practically nil. Your preselector is the right tool
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00213.html (9,955 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:17:29 +0200
Hi Rick, that's what I had in mind. Taking the 7 MHz filter as an example, there is 40 dB attenuation on ~3.5 MHz. But on 6 MHz the attenuation is practically nil. Your preselector is the right tool
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00214.html (9,713 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Preselector, was: Re: Scads of used Icom IC-7300 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 22:41:49 +0200
Only about 10 dB of attenuation 1 MHz away from the tuned frequency. Not exactly brilliant. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-09/msg00253.html (8,014 bytes)

10. [TenTec] Orion 565, board A0, diode D115 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:29:41 +0300
Does anybody know the location of diode D115 on rear I/O board A0, Orion 565? Diode type is CMR1-10, marking C10, 1 A, 1000 V, case SMB. This diode is connected anti-parallel with 13.8 V DC input, af
/archives//html/TenTec/2015-09/msg00007.html (7,120 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] repairs (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:33:54 +0100
PBT (with constant filter bandwidth) is easily done with single conversion and single filter. Just vary VFO and BFO frequencies simultaneosly to keep the resulting carrier frequency unchanged. 73, Si
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00309.html (8,378 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] repairs (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:50:36 +0100
... Well, the terminology isn't standardised well enough. Orion's PBT works exactly as "IF Shift" in your description, and I'd guess that Palstar rig does the same, judging from LSB and USB marks aro
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-10/msg00312.html (11,663 bytes)

13. [TenTec] Reliable 4.5 kHz Sweep Needed for Orion 565 (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:17:42 +0200
Can somebody recommend a 565 firmware version that has a reliable Sweep operation with 4.5 kHz Sweep Range? It will operate simultaneously with serial communication. It may slow down the things, but
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00098.html (8,912 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Orion tuning rate (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:33:59 +0200
The only thing that you can set separately is "Encoder Rate" in "Others" menu. It should be set to "Fast" for both internal and external encoders, providing 250 steps or 2.5 kHz per rotation with 10
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00295.html (7,613 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] ESR vs Leakage (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 04:51:01 +0200
No, there is no direct relationship between ESR and DC leakage. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00326.html (7,435 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] Rigs at WRTC (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 22:14:44 +0200
Well, those graphs are not about TX wideband noise at all. They just show clicks. Are there any graphs that show the TX noise across the entire band, and even other bands? The levels are expected to
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00701.html (9,937 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] THANK YOU AND APOLOGY - for Billy (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:08:23 +0200
The usual practice is this: * TX on, say, 14 MHz, transmits through a 14 MHz bandpass filter, which attenuates the TX noise on 21 MHz. * RX on, say, 21 MHz, receives through a 21 MHz bandpass filter,
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-07/msg00810.html (8,680 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Orion 565 tuning encoder (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:41:29 +0200
It's OAK GRIGSBY part number 94Q 125-02-00606 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00173.html (8,203 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Orion 565 tuning encoder (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:23:13 +0200
I had the same problem. VFO B encoder had a supply voltage of only 4.66 V. After tightening 4 fixing screws on the A9 board, the voltage at encoder rose to 4.77 V and it started workig. 73, Sinisa
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00175.html (8,631 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Orion 565 tuning encoder (score: 1)
Author: shristov <shristov@ptt.rs>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2014 00:08:49 +0200
Could you power the VFO B encoder by external +5.0 V? 73, Sinisa
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-06/msg00179.html (8,874 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu