Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wb5jnc@centurytel.net: 291 ]

Total 291 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TenTec] Built in SWR meter bannans (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:52:49 -0500
Jim, TNX for the info. Does it matter whether the THHN is solid or stranded? What core size do you recommend (I'm guessing 2" or so)? Also, (purely from a "dumb questions dept." perspective) would a
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00254.html (11,446 bytes)

202. [TenTec] FS: 217 & 219 filters (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 17:22:13 -0600
Clearing out the excess stock: 217 (500 Hz) and 219 (250 Hz) 9 MHz filters, tested in the "ALalyzer Analyzer" (Argosy) and seem to work as they should. $60 each shipped CONUS or $110 for the pair shi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00047.html (6,980 bytes)

203. Re: [TenTec] FS: 217 & 219 filters (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:10:00 -0600
Filters are spoken for. TNX/73, Al
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00048.html (7,573 bytes)

204. Re: [TenTec] ORION shows strange behavior, like drift during TX (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 07:54:44 -0600
I wouldn't totally discount the possibility of RF sneaking back in where it wasn't supposed to - the cable to the footswitch could be functioning as a "Murphy"* antenna. Might a snap-on ferrite choke
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00060.html (13,760 bytes)

205. Re: [TenTec] TEN-TEC SSB NETS ON SUNDAY (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 12:33:06 -0500
Wade, You gotta give these folks some slack - they may not be able to move because they have special XTAL control rigs just for the net frequency HI HI!! (Or maybe their tuning knob is stuck???) 73,
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00227.html (10,368 bytes)

206. Re: [TenTec] Digital noise in ten Tec Argosy II (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 21:30:29 -0500
Maybe apples and oranges, but I seem to remember a thread (or conversation with TT service?) back when about display noise being related to bypass cap issues on the Omni-Ds - I'd guess the same might
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00237.html (10,885 bytes)

207. Re: [TenTec] TT Orange ball: "Press Release" (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:09:39 -0500
Wonder if the guys at the factory are listening? -- Press Release from "Pseudo Ten-Tek Inc." (Undated, sometime in the future) - We at Pseudo Ten-Tek (hereafter PTT) pride ourselves on listening to o
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-03/msg00317.html (10,912 bytes)

208. Re: [TenTec] TenTec 544 (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:42:49 -0600
I've seen the RIT/offset circuit cause this kind of issue. The offset trim pot may need to be readjusted. The procedure is in the manual on page 3-39 (at least on the copy that's posted on TT's websi
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00195.html (8,009 bytes)

209. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire Balanced Antenna Tuners (QST Test) (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:58:06 -0600
Rick, TNX for the spreadsheet - it's an interesting read. What I gleaned in a quick analysis is that while they aren't as convenient, the "old school" link-coupled tuners (in this case, the Johnson M
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00206.html (11,465 bytes)

210. Re: [TenTec] low power 509 Argonaut (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:21:08 -0600
Phil, This fellow seems to be pretty heavily into repairing the old Argonauts: http://www.earlandrews.com/argonot1.html Maybe he could shed some light on what to look for.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00373.html (8,218 bytes)

211. Re: [TenTec] New or Used Decision; Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:55:46 -0600
What I find interesting (if I'm reading Sherwood's chart correctly) is that the Corsair (other than filter ultimate rejection) and Omni V come in very close to a statistical dead heat with the Omni V
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00163.html (10,103 bytes)

212. Re: [TenTec] Model 282 filter problem (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 12:27:14 -0600
Mike, Before blaming the filter try tuning around and/or move the passband tuning control (PBT) back and forth a bit. The 282 has an extremely narrow peak and can sound like there's nothing there if
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00024.html (9,153 bytes)

213. Re: [TenTec] Need parts for Argosy 525D (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:44:51 -0600
Roger, The 48057 is the stock 4 pole 2.4 KHz filter used in the 9 MHz IF of the Argosy and Corsair (560, not the 561 Corsair II.) The model 220 (or 48058) is the 8 pole version and is a "drop-in" rep
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00096.html (8,821 bytes)

214. [TenTec] WTB: Argosy parts rig (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 08:43:05 -0500
Looking for an Argosy (analog or digital) "basket case" or parts rig. Please provide info on failure event or symptoms, physical/electrical condition, serial number, whether unit is "as failed" or if
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00284.html (7,363 bytes)

215. Re: [TenTec] for sale 302 remote encoder (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:59:17 -0500
Is it a straight '320 or a 320D? (There is a difference.) TNX/73, Al
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00325.html (8,181 bytes)

216. Re: [TenTec] Older rigs (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:46:23 -0500
Bob, Point (2) is well taken. Back in the days of "vinyl" when I worked in small market radio I could hear when a stylus was getting "edgy" (chipped or worn); it had the same effect on me as a chalkb
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00114.html (11,044 bytes)

217. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:56:02 -0500
Others may differ with my advice, but I'm not sure you really need to "finish the alphabet" before you start listening. As a suggestion, start listening to W1AW's code practice sessions - even the "h
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00041.html (10,620 bytes)

218. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 08:04:34 -0500
One other thing (which can be a source of controversy for some folks): I was emphatically told (by my now SK dad who was first licensed in 1934 and served as a seagoing radio op in the Coast Guard du
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00056.html (10,578 bytes)

219. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 09:35:26 -0500
Rick, Funny you should mention "sending with anything" - in one of my typical "oddball" moments I made a single-lever "picopaddle" out of a tiny SPDT contact assembly I salvaged out of a defunct CD-R
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00062.html (12,523 bytes)

220. Re: [TenTec] new to CW dxing (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:10:04 -0500
To borrow from an old quip: any fool can work DX with a kilowatt amp and a big antenna. It takes talent to do it with LPCA (Low Power, Crummy Antenna.) 73, Al
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00065.html (10,320 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu