Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com: 476 ]

Total 476 documents matching your query.

121. Topband: Trying again (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:30:57 -0400
Figure 1: 1/4 wave 40m GP with 4 elevated resonant radials at 10" above real, high accuracy GND. Figure 2: Elevation plot for 1/4 wave GP - Peak elevation angle 22.0 degrees Figure 3: 1/2 wave vertic
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00092.html (7,468 bytes)

122. Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:37:40 -0400
--Original Message-- From: Charlie Cunningham [mailto:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:23 PM To: 'Shoppa, Tim'; 'rodenkirch_llc@msn.com'; 'armstrmj@aol.com'; 'w8ji@w8j
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00093.html (24,952 bytes)

123. Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:49:37 -0400
?? _____________________________________________ From: Charlie Cunningham [mailto:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 1:13 PM To: 'Shoppa, Tim'; 'rodenkirch_llc@msn.com'; '
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00096.html (23,620 bytes)

124. Re: Topband: FW: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 13:55:33 -0400
So, I see, Jim I even tried just copying the word document into the body of an e-mail but apparently that didn't work either? I'll give that another try. Charlie This reflector does not accept attach
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00097.html (10,674 bytes)

125. Topband: Verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:05:20 -0400
Figure 1: 1/4 wave 40m GP with 4 elevated resonant radials at 10" above real, high accuracy GND. Figure 2: Elevation plot for 1/4 wave GP - Peak elevation angle 22.0 degrees Figure 3: 1/2 wave vertic
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00099.html (7,617 bytes)

126. Topband: No Joy! Try e-mail? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 14:14:32 -0400
Sorry folks - no luck getingthe document through - even whe I copied it into the bosy of an e-mail and tried to send it to the reflector. If anyone's interested, send me your e-mail address and I'll
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00100.html (6,791 bytes)

127. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:08:47 -0400
I'll do the 3/8 wave case later, Carl. I didn't have time to get back to it today because I got all bolluxed up trying to include an attachment to my reflector post. Also, even trying to embed the do
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00102.html (23,800 bytes)

128. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 16:00:30 -0400
Thanks, Jim! Have a good Sunday afternoon/evening! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of James Rodenkirch Sent: Sunday, September
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00105.html (26,756 bytes)

129. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 16:04:46 -0400
Thanks for the tip, Augie! I didn't try the "plain text" approach, but I'll keep it in mind! 73, Charlie,K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00106.html (11,791 bytes)

130. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 16:10:42 -0400
Thanks, Augie I finally just resorted to sending it to interested parties via e-mail. Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Augie Hans
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00107.html (11,358 bytes)

131. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta thanshorter versions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 17:08:12 -0400
Hi, Carl Well, yes, high angle radiators have a definite advantage in dealing with hilltop or mountain top repeaters as I pointed out in one of my earlier posts/replies. My experience with 160 is sig
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00108.html (30,493 bytes)

132. Topband: FW: Verticals - 1/4. 1/2 and 5/8 wave - Hope this works (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:04:18 -0400
Hello, Jo!! Good to hear from Indonesia!! Here you are! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Charlie Cunningham [mailto:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 2:46 PM
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00109.html (10,968 bytes)

133. Topband: FW: Verticals - 1/4. 1/2 and 5/8 wave - Hope this works (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 19:06:24 -0400
Hello, Jo!! Good to hear from Indonesia!! Here you are! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Charlie Cunningham [mailto:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com] Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2013 2:46 PM
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00110.html (10,793 bytes)

134. Re: Topband: CAT5 for Flag Antenna Feedline ? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 20:19:30 -0400
Those flag, pennant and KAZ antennas really work well. At least my KAZ terminated delta loop did!! Great option for those of us without the real estate for Beverages! (And it's feasible/possible to c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00134.html (13,069 bytes)

135. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 21:39:43 -0400
Wow! That's a good one!! I worked Jacky, 3B8CF many years ago on 160, but never 3B9! Lowest bands I've ever worked 3B9 were 40 and 30 m. I worked Jacky just before sunset here in Raleigh NC! Worked h
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00136.html (7,923 bytes)

136. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:17:55 -0400
Well, I don't have a 160 transmit antenna at present time, but I do still have the 80m GP. Might give them a try there. I worked Jacky often on 80m. 73, Charlie, K4OTV Wow! That's a good one!! I work
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00140.html (8,881 bytes)

137. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 22:44:45 -0400
Valid points, Keith. I think the boys that went to FO0AAA did good to hang up that KAZ terminated Loop that John, ON4UN, put together for them! Some years ago, My friend, Jim, W4RS and I put together
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00144.html (7,908 bytes)

138. Topband: FW: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:31:34 -0400
Hi, Garry Well, your e-mail prompted me to look up the QSO with Jacky. It was January, 1, 1987, according to my log. The call that I had at that time was N4BZX, but I later recovered my old K4OTV cal
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00153.html (11,005 bytes)

139. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:58:19 -0400
Hi, Garry I did log a QSO, with 3B9R, 4/10/1999 on 15m CW. By then, I had recovered my original K4OTV call from 1957. Over the years, I lost the K4OTV call, because, back then, if we moved to a diffe
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00157.html (11,479 bytes)

140. Re: Topband: 3B9EME (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:56:03 -0400
Hi, Charlie I wasn't aware that no preamp was used with the FO0AAA terminated loop. I have modeled the FO0AAA loop in EZNEC, and, because it has a bit more area than my smaller, 40' X 10' KAZ termina
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00160.html (9,304 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu