Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:i4jmy@iol.it: 139 ]

Total 139 documents matching your query.

121. Re:Topband: Receiving Loops (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:21:41 +0100
Kevin, think about detuning your 160m transmitting antenna when receiving, this is the first step. Then, if the problem is still clearance, you can try with a simple loop antenna in the following way
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00248.html (8,300 bytes)

122. Re:Topband: To Balun or not to Balun that is the question. (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:55:50 +0100
By the way, depending the diameter of the coil, line lenght, and coil position, I'm afraid those 6 turns are not enough to have a good choke on 20m. Expecially in cases where a choke is not on a curr
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00312.html (7,838 bytes)

123. Re: Topband: To Balun or not to Balun that is the question. (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:13:27 +0100
Like this "sounds" much better. A reasonable number of turns for the band in use and a larger diameter winding. Note that each time the number of turns is doubled, the reactance is multiplied by a ra
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00327.html (8,606 bytes)

124. Re:Topband: To Balun or not to Balun that is the question. (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:31:38 +0100
Unless a small reduction of RF energy fixed the problem, for example lowering the voltage just under a semiconductor threshold, hardly those 6 turns works like an effective choke at 7 Mhz. Only chanc
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00330.html (8,892 bytes)

125. Re: Topband: Balun Discussions (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 23:09:50 +0100
Nobody told that beyond the resonance the choke impedance goes further increasing, of course it doesn't because of inductor self capacitance. Disregarding self capacitance, which is a parasitic effec
/archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00340.html (8,427 bytes)

126. Re: Topband: Balun Discussions (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 15:02:43 +0100
A plate choke must ?resonate? well above the operating frequency when installed and connected to the amplifier circuits. Choke anomalies of such kind are easily visibile tracking for PI return loss,
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00011.html (9,248 bytes)

127. Re: Topband: Balun Discussions (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 18:32:34 +0100
Hi Tom, the procedure of parking choke resonances out of bands can't be used in a 2-30 MHz continuous coverage unit, and I don't like to have chokes like that in my own amplifiers. When plate choke w
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00014.html (9,953 bytes)

128. Re:Topband: 160m int L (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:01:43 +0100
Inverted L does not necessarily need a cap (a reactance) to work and to be properly matched. It may be matched with a capacitor with when its feed-point is looking reactive (inductively), as well as
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00061.html (8,833 bytes)

129. RE: Topband: 160m int L (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:22:22 +0100
That antenna is basically an upside down GP with two radials, and it works fine if the radials are quite high above the ground, and if the vertical section is &frac14; WL. Opposite to an inverted L t
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00062.html (8,635 bytes)

130. Re: Topband: 160m int L (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:50:10 +0100
Sinisa, also I don?t like L unsymmetry, but what do you mean for an inverted T? Upper of the loading horizontal wires, the horizontal section of the inverted T, currents are low and radiated energy i
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00063.html (8,271 bytes)

131. Re: Topband: Apparent Multiple Resonances on a single antenna (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:10:46 +0100
Beeing Bills? antenna shortened, resonances will not appear on odd harmonics, neither on even ones. With linear elements (not shortened) resonances actually occur also on even harmonics. There, anywa
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00080.html (8,849 bytes)

132. Re:Topband: 2 Wire Beverage Feedpoint Matching (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:47:16 +0100
It?s a good advice if RF transformers for this application are wound as multifilar windings, interleaving wires, each winding covering all the available core space, side to side with the others. If f
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00102.html (9,282 bytes)

133. Re:Topband: Col-atch-co 160/80 meter antenna (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:11:03 +0100
The Col-atch-co antenna is 42' tall. On 80m it's purely a capacitively top loaded vertical with a wire hat. Efficiency will be the highest possible for that height, and, of course, function of the us
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00117.html (8,830 bytes)

134. Re: Topband: Inverted-L Summary (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:53:10 +0100
10 pieces in parallel, each one 3.3ft long, will better approximate a capacitor than a 33ft long single run of coaxial cable, at least at 2Mhz. All shields togheter, one side, all inners togheter the
/archives//html/Topband/2004-01/msg00160.html (8,180 bytes)

135. Re:Topband: Tophat? Does it have to be at the top? (score: 1)
Author: "i4jmy@iol.it" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:01:22 +0200
If the hat has the purpose of substantially loading a short element in the most efficient possible way, then it has to be at the top of the element. If the hat has instead the purpose of loading an e
/archives//html/Topband/2004-06/msg00016.html (8,041 bytes)

136. Re: Topband: Efficiently Matching Low-Impedance Antennas to 50ohms (score: 1)
Author: "Mauri" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:07:18 +0200
Assuming the ammeter is based on a thermocouple, your measurement has sense, even if the impedance is other than 50 Ohms and reactive. The same doesn'apply to bird wattmeter, which doesn't measure p
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00068.html (8,101 bytes)

137. Re: Topband: Bird Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Mauri" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 18:10:15 +0200
Just as I told and You confirmed, the real power is not directly measured by a bird wattmeter when load isn't 50 Ohms. The real power (when a reflected power is existing) is only obtainable by subtr
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00080.html (8,933 bytes)

138. Re: Topband: Bird Meter (score: 1)
Author: "Mauri" <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:46:01 +0200
Bird 43 is a useful instrument, and I agree with your points about directional coupler meters advantages. Sensors, diodes or thermocouples (bolometers) have instead pros and cons. It remains the fact
/archives//html/Topband/2005-09/msg00090.html (9,534 bytes)

139. Re: Topband: 160 wire yagi (score: 1)
Author: Mauri <i4jmy@iol.it>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:39:21 +0200
Yes, it's true. For some years I used a fixed two elements wire yagi @200 ft (almost straight elements), remotely tuning the passive element as a director or a reflector. Some precise open wire trasm
/archives//html/Topband/2010-09/msg00039.html (9,611 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu