Mail Archive Search: <+from:k6se@juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k6se@juno.com: 594 ]

Total 594 documents matching your query.

181. Topband: New TopBand frequency in LY (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 09:14:08 -0700; New TopBand plan in LY 1715-1800 10w 1810-1850 1000w 1850-2000 10w Also, may be anybody know who have license to work in 1715-1800 ? == The world-wide 160-meter frequency allocation list provided by; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00017.html (7,621 bytes)
182. Fw: Re: Topband: 160 meter DX window question (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:17:31 -0700; "1.830-1.835MHz is suppose to be a DX window, right?" == That's right, but unfortunately the use of a DX window is subject to different interpretations by some. I think the problem stems from some 16; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00021.html (8,813 bytes)
183. Topband: Frequency Allocations (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 00:40:05 -0700; "My ITU freq allocations table may be out of date, but it shows that as of WARC 79 footnote 488 allowed Poland and 14 other countries to allocate "up to 200 kHz to the amateur service in the bands 17; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00025.html (7,453 bytes)
184. Topband: Frequency Allocations (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 01:16:23 -0700; < I am afraid this thread has run its course and really doesn't match the intent of this reflector... Please let's get back to the main purpose of this reflector > I just checked the footnotes to the; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00026.html (8,068 bytes)
185. Topband: Beverage Front to Back Non-exsistant (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 18:37:51 -0700; I once had a 550-foot Beverage in the dirction of Europe. It was about equal to my phased verticals in that direction on 160m, and worked even better on 80m and 40m. I remember during CW contests on; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00087.html (8,360 bytes)
186. Topband: Beverage Length (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 07:25:36 -0700; "Late last winter, I was curious about the optimum length of a beverage. I set out to decipher why the length was so important." == IMO, a specific length for a Beverage antenna is not "optimum" unle; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00112.html (8,598 bytes)
187. Topband: Low Dipole Performance (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:49:12 -0800; "I have what is considered a low dipole. About 40-50 feet over it's entire length. According to some texts, this antenna is virtually useless for DX purposes due to it's radiation angle of 90 degrees; /archives//html/Topband/2000-10/msg00172.html (7,191 bytes)
188. Topband: Sub-bands Needed on 160m (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2000 22:07:22 -0700; Hi, Dave, Fried, I brought this up with you once before, but it comes to mind again with the recent FCC's denial of RM-9806. RM-9806 was the result of a petition by the California Six Meter Club requ; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00012.html (9,091 bytes)
189. Topband: Hybrid Coupler (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 18:22:51 -0700; Has anyone built and used the hybrid coupler described in ON4UN's "Low-Band DXing" book? It's for feeding a pair of phased verticals with 90-degree phasing. I'm interested in knowing what type of cap; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00031.html (7,758 bytes)
190. Topband: Making low wires more visible de K0FF (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 19:53:29 -0700; Re: Beverages: "Another cure is to not slope the ends, and bring them down along a thick obstacle. Six or ten feet of vertical drop is six or ten feet of drop, whether in one small area or a 60 foot; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00038.html (7,784 bytes)
191. Topband: Hybrid Coupler (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 11:33:41 -0700; The hybrid coupler in ON4UN's book is a single-band device for feeding 2-el verticals in quadrature. One output is lagging 90 degrees from the other. Feedlines to the 50-ohm verticals must be 1/4-wav; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00043.html (7,441 bytes)
192. Topband: Stew Perry (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 09:10:25 -0700; My station and my contesting ability do not warrant my entering any contest with the intention of beating any competition. The primary reason I enter any contest is to have fun. It affords the opport; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00088.html (8,006 bytes)
193. Topband: ZD9ZM (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:01:25 -0700; ZD9ZM showed up on 1828.5 tonight. Lotsa QSB from in the noise to as high as 599. Was lucky to catch him on a peak for #179. Big pile for him on 1833.5 +/-. Sounded like the entire USA was calling hi; /archives//html/Topband/2000-09/msg00093.html (6,834 bytes)
194. Topband: TopBand Receivers (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:19:55 -0700; Hi, Barry, Surprisingly, the 25-year old Drake R-4C is reportedly the best receiver from a survey I took on the Web a couple of years ago. But not the stock R-4C -- you want one that has the Sherwood; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00050.html (8,501 bytes)
195. Topband: Good Receivers for Top Band (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 08:57:02 -0700; "I had a R4C many years ago, and found that much (not all) of the filter blowby in this rx was actually signal leakage around the filters. So I spent an evening with copper pc board and shield materi; /archives//html/Topband/2000-08/msg00064.html (8,348 bytes)
196. Topband: Flags and Pennants (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:10:49 -0700; Since the appearance of my "Flags and Pennants" article in the July issue of QST, I've been bombarded with questions via e-mail and telephone, hi. One of the more predominant questions is, "Who makes; /archives//html/Topband/2000-07/msg00002.html (6,855 bytes)
197. Topband: 1999 ARRL 160-Meter Contest Results (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:14:22 -0700; The 1999 ARRL 160-Meter contest results, to appear in the August issue of QST, are available on the ARRL Web site in the "Members Only" section. Jeff, K1ZM's awesome single-op score of 395,300 was wo; /archives//html/Topband/2000-07/msg00005.html (6,912 bytes)
198. Topband: Re: Pennant Antenna with Remote Termination Control (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 17:10:24 -0700; "Taking an other look at amplifiers for the Pennant. I would suggest using a Hi z input balanced J fet or mos fet amp directly at the antenna. This would provide a good match to the antenna z and pro; /archives//html/Topband/2000-07/msg00049.html (8,033 bytes)
199. Topband: Willis Island (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 20:11:35 -0700; Spoke with Nick, VK9WI today on 10-meters. He said he would be on 160 all night tonight after his sunset at about 0745Z. See y'all in Dayton. 73, de Earl, K6SE -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.co; /archives//html/Topband/2000-05/msg00022.html (6,576 bytes)
200. Topband: Mark-V FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 14:23:20 -0700; Here at the Dayton Hamvention Yaesu unveiled their latest new product - the Mark-V FT-1000MP. It looks identical to the present MP, but here are the five main things the Mark-V has that the present M; /archives//html/Topband/2000-05/msg00045.html (7,082 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]