Mail Archive Search: <+from:k6se@juno.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k6se@juno.com: 594 ]

Total 594 documents matching your query.

81. Topband: Ten-Tec Orion Specs (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:53:26 -0700; For those interested, Ten-Tec has released their specs for the new model 565 Orion HF transceiver. They looked good enough to me, so I placed my order for one. Expected delivery is in October. The sp; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00010.html (7,674 bytes)
82. Topband: Ten-Tec Orion Specs (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:42:16 -0700; "Earl, you are a couragious man ! I always wait untill they have sorted out the inevitable teething problems before buying a new piece of anything." == I was going to wait until the initial bugs (if; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00012.html (6,864 bytes)
83. Topband: FLAGANDPENNANTANTENNAS (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 07:53:24 -0700; Hi, Doug, "Please contact me directly if you have information about this group." == The moderator for the flagandpennantantennas group is George Maroti. His e-mail address is curious.george@att.net .; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00063.html (6,501 bytes)
84. Topband: 4U1UN and VP9 activity (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 09:25:16 -0700; I worked 4U1UN on 160m a few years ago in a contest and received the QSL, but I haven't heard a peep from them since on any band. 73, de Earl, K6SE; /archives//html/Topband/2002-08/msg00070.html (7,190 bytes)
85. Fw: Topband: Rules of 2002 South Pacific 160 contest (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 18:54:24 -0700; In addition to the following rules sent by Steve, VK6VZ for the Pacific 160 Metres Contest, I found the following on the ARRL Web site for the same contest: "To avoid QRM between modes stations are a; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00065.html (9,189 bytes)
86. Topband: Magnetic Slot Antenna (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 09:35:17 -0700; Second, although he uses two wavelengths of wire folded back on itself, the same antenna can be configured using only one wavelength of wire without the foldback. In either configuration of the anten; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00068.html (7,822 bytes)
87. Topband: salt the ground? (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 15:49:36 -0700; with a balloon-supported vertical, I can verify that a moist, pure salt ground works outstandingly well. However, the salty ground there extends for several miles and the few hundred pounds of salt; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00094.html (8,373 bytes)
88. Topband: Balloon vertical antenna (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:03:29 -0700; "I am consideering a balloon for a 160 vertical. Questions... copperweld wire? thickness? balloon volume to 1/2 or 5/8 wave vertical? What about 4~8 elevated radials in 30 ft tower?" == For a balloon; /archives//html/Topband/2002-07/msg00123.html (9,947 bytes)
89. Topband: I am getting ready to re-enter 160Mtrs and want a little advice (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:40:48 -0700; "I recently installed a "Tee" antenna with four elevated radials. The ground conductivity is really poor due to the sand, gravel, glacial-flour and rocks that make up the local landscape. I live in a; /archives//html/Topband/2002-06/msg00008.html (10,657 bytes)
90. Topband: Take-off angle (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:40:28 -0700; "I've only got 8 - 50' radials stitched into the sod. Why only 8? I'm lazy! This summer I intend to correct that to lower the radiation angle." -- Adding radials does not lower the radiation angle --; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00001.html (8,307 bytes)
91. Topband: Topband Angle changes at sunrise/sunset (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 18:46:07 -0700; "At sunrise, ionospheric layers are tilted downward or lowered as the sun rises, refracting signals downward at steeper angles, while at sunset layers are raised slightly as the sun sets, with little; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00028.html (7,391 bytes)
92. Topband: Inverted V antenna (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 12:58:48 -0700; "I think we are forgetting that an Inverted V antenna is a vertical antenna and a horizontal antenna. As a vertical antenna, it is a pretty fair vertical." == Questionable as "a pretty fair vertical"; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00046.html (6,891 bytes)
93. Topband: Visalia Topband Dinner (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 10:26:59 -0700; On 26 April, Topbanders enjoyed a special treat at the International DX Convention in Visalia, California. At the Topbanders' DX Dinner there, 160-meter DXers from around the world enjoyed good food,; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00068.html (8,653 bytes)
94. Topband: Inverted V antenna! (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 21:34:21 -0700; "I just modeled an inverted V antenna on EZNEC. The apex height is at 87'(for an 89' tower), ends are 2 feet above ground, ground conductivity is 1.5s/m, dielectric constant is 13 and 1/4 wave elemen; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00071.html (7,892 bytes)
95. Topband: Inverted V Antennas (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:54:38 -0700; "A question came up about the ground specifications I gave for Tucson, Az. The answer is YES, they were correct. They were acquired from the U of A here in Tucson. Tucson is ringed by copper mines. T; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00076.html (7,055 bytes)
96. Topband: Monster antennas (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:09:30 -0700; Ford, N0FP wrote (regarding monster verticals): "Does 200' play better on 160M than 130'? Rohn makes an insulated section for the 45G. Does insulating it make sense?" == To me, insulating a tower to; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00100.html (8,755 bytes)
97. Topband: Shunt feeding a tower with side mounted yagi (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 06:58:46 -0700; Contrary to the belief of many, a beam located at a lower level on the tower does not "shield" any top loading which is above that level. The lower beam merely has less top loading effect than if it; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00173.html (8,851 bytes)
98. Topband: Shunt feeding a tower with side mounted yagi (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 07:52:16 -0700; 'While "shield" may be a poor choice of words, a large yagi or yagis mounted low on a shunt-fed tower can have a detrimental effect on system efficiency if they are large enough or enough of them. I; /archives//html/Topband/2002-05/msg00186.html (9,156 bytes)
99. Topband: Re: Vactrols and Flag (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 10:08:30 -0700; "The QST article recommends using non-metallic support poles for flags and pennants. The 16 ft. high vertical section six feet off the ground calls for a 20 ft. mast. I'd be interested to know what s; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00024.html (8,351 bytes)
100. Topband: 160 meter vertical (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 07:54:22 -0700; "I'm sure that someone has used Rohn 25 as a 160 vertical either as stand alone or with a stinger. Is there any dimensional info available someplace?" == Because shunt feeding is as efficient as seri; /archives//html/Topband/2002-04/msg00077.html (7,080 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]