Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:olinger@bellsouth.net: 438 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

41. Re: Topband: BOG antenna-more info ? (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 10:26:57 -0500
"The ground around here is mostly sandstone, clay, shale and sand. The BOG could run about 270' in a straight line but that doesn't seem long enough even using a pre-amp." The issue for the unpredict
/archives//html/Topband/2006-11/msg00067.html (8,768 bytes)

42. Topband: Modeling verticals (fat, skinny, etc) on EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 08:36:12 -0500
EZNEC 4.0: Options Menu: Power Level. Uncheck "Absolute V,I sources" Initially set "Power level (watts)" to 1 Use a 1 meter long vertical RX antenna, with a meter's distance separating ground and th
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00222.html (8,464 bytes)

43. Re: Topband: Scientists Predict Big Solar Cycle (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:36:48 -0500
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/21dec_cycle24.htm?list50675 ...For supposedly being at a solar minimum now, the sun has really not been behaving like past minima...at least the ones I've seen
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00254.html (9,504 bytes)

44. Re: Topband: Modeling verticals (fat, skinny, etc) on EZNEC (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 17:23:09 -0500
"...I think we are having a semantic issue here." As if to diminish Tom's correct argument by labeling it? Attention to careful language that does not lend itself to false mental simplifications is i
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00276.html (10,057 bytes)

45. Re: Topband: Coax Shield vs. Ground & elevated radials (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 18:42:36 -0500
SM0MDG: >> To decople my my inverted L I was using a RG213 coil made of 18 turns on a 11 cm plastic pipe. Would this arrangement be enough to decouple my top loaded vertical with 2 elevated radials?
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00012.html (8,670 bytes)

46. Re: Topband: A question on L's (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:06:47 -0500
"Think of it this way -- the other half of the antenna (the radial system) is very broadband, so only the top half (the radiator) contributes to narrowing the bandwidth. " Unfortunately if one models
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00151.html (7,608 bytes)

47. Re: Topband: A question on L's (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:15:33 -0500
The NEC4 model I quoted was for #12 wire (which alas I failed to mention) and was only to demonstrate that the bandwidth issue was not anything inherent about an ideal 1/4 w vertical vs an ideal 1/2
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00179.html (7,964 bytes)

48. Re: Topband: Finding buried radials (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 01:08:44 -0500
Metal detector. "Does anyone know of a way to find buried radials, short of digging up the backyard? " _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00203.html (7,149 bytes)

49. Re: Topband: Recent 160m Antenna Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:33:18 -0500
"So in case it's back to inverted Ls (either extended or regular) it would also be nice to have views on the original question. What theoretically and practically appears to give the best results, th
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00241.html (9,420 bytes)

50. Re: Topband: Why not add power class to SP TBDC exchange? (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:31:42 -0500
"I love the SP just the way it is, but I think this would be an interesting addition." My sentiment also. Wouldn't change the exchange that much. Since the grid square ends in two numbers just affix
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00011.html (8,127 bytes)

51. Re: Topband: 160/80 Sloping Inverted L (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 07:12:34 -0400
Pat wrote: == I am contemplating the construction of a dual band sloping inverted L for 160 and 80 meters ... I have modeled it in MMANA and am looking for advice... You can see what the design ... h
/archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00014.html (8,200 bytes)

52. Re: Topband: Power (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:37:50 -0400
In the discussion about "benefits" of higher and higher power... Broadcasters are not concerned about reciprocity, e.g. two-way QSO's. An extra 10 db in signal can make use of paths with less reliabi
/archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00034.html (9,357 bytes)

53. Re: Topband: NASA - What's Wrong with the Sun? (Nothing) (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2008 11:37:16 -0400
...Things will get better...unless they get worse! == The spread for 1933 spotless days is very interesting. If 1933 is the pattern for the current cycle, the 08/09 season will be very minimal. Also
/archives//html/Topband/2008-07/msg00068.html (8,865 bytes)

54. Re: Topband: Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:02:58 -0400
The effect of trees is very murky and poorly researched (for cause). They certainly do not respond in the same manner as metal conductors. Some where in the archives of this or the TowerTalk reflect
/archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00042.html (9,368 bytes)

55. Re: Topband: [Topband] Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:08:22 -0400
5 wavelengths away is hardly in the far field, with some degree of common ground between. Even at a mile, one is still talking about ground wave, and to draw small distinctions, one needs a model th
/archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00068.html (10,662 bytes)

56. Re: Topband: [Topband] Inverted "L" vs." T" (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:01:35 -0400
EZNEC 5 is the graphical interface which runs a version of NEC in it. The ham version "shells" NEC2. It will use either a Minninec or Summerfield ground. Both of these have their limitations and got
/archives//html/Topband/2008-10/msg00073.html (11,023 bytes)

57. Re: Topband: Inverted L Tuning - Solved (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:54:55 -0500
I am presuming from your description that the tower is being used to support the vertical run of a 160 1/4 wave inverted L. If so, getting the SWR better by removing the connection to radials only pr
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00050.html (8,931 bytes)

58. Re: Topband: Inverted L matching problem (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 22:26:00 -0500
Your SWR results suggest that you should not connect the braid to the tower base. The tower's ground rods do little for your ground loss issues under the vertical portion of the antenna. That is affe
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00058.html (9,448 bytes)

59. Re: Topband: shunt fed towers (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:50:00 -0500
-- What I have read here and elsewhere is an urban legend substitution of easy feed-point for performance, where "works well" means SWR instead of far field signal strength. Not all high performing a
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00103.html (8,955 bytes)

60. Re: Topband: Good tuner for 160 m (score: 1)
Author: "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:47:56 -0500
Coil stock is still being manufactured new by Barker and Williamson, who I think was making the stuff when I built an amp as a teenager. http://www.bwantennas.com/coils/aduxlex.htm 73, Guy. K2AV ____
/archives//html/Topband/2008-12/msg00163.html (7,967 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu