Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 231 ]

Total 231 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 18:11:29 2003
Steve, you are "going right" Yuri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00305.html (8,742 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions ") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 18:13:07 2003
supporting Isn't that the other way? stress Clear as a mud :-) Old wives tales. It's mechanical structural engineering 101, and also some street smarts. Regards, Yuri Blanarovich, P.Eng, M.Sc., K3BU,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00306.html (7,875 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Re: Guying self-supporting towers (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 18:19:07 2003
Right on Bud, just consider masts on the sail boats. If guying it was so wrong, you would not see the masts reinforced with 4 way guy wires that start at the same point at the bottom, are spread out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00307.html (7,096 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 18:20:15 2003
Master's degree in mechanical engineering. Designed few bridge, crane and tower structures plus Razor antennas that stayed up in Canadian winters. Would that deflect some mud thrown by those unenligh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00308.html (9,179 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 18:27:06 2003
guyed load. That is the example of wrong blanket statement. Force induced by guy wires is fractional from the forces that self-supporting tower is experiencing when alone. Again there is no need to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00309.html (9,464 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] Old World Thinking-guying self supporting towers (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 17 20:46:55 2003
Imagine this: You live in Florida, you have perfectly designed antenna/tower system rated for 90 mph winds. Normal situation. Then you hear that huricane is coming at 210 mph. What will YOU do? Pray
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00312.html (8,563 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 09:28:13 2003
to Herr TT Administrator. As far as I am aware I tried to present some reasoning based on engineering knowledge. If you or anyone wants calculations for a specific design or situation, you can contra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00323.html (10,690 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 10:18:49 2003
The 'properly' was put in to avoid smart alec situation by someone putting guy wires on 100ft tower at 10ft off the ground and trying to snatch the purse. Implies reasonable situations like lets say
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00325.html (11,931 bytes)

29. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 13:18:25 2003
Sorry to put you in that situation, but I defend and stand up for truth, if this is not the place for it, then I am sorry to cause waves. Yuri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00334.html (9,779 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (was "Concrete suggestions") (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 16:50:14 2003
If the fleas will not go away, what's elephant got to do? Seems some reasons are presented, so I will try to engage one more time. I hope it is shining some light on the problem and will save someone
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00338.html (17,927 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Guyed self-supporters (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 18 22:44:55 2003
Chuck, Have a look at: http://www.c-conceptsinc.com/index.html C-Concepts has excellent page, slide presentation, engineering software that can be used for 30 days (cost over $5k), bunch of examples
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00357.html (7,821 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Crank Up Slop....MORE (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Mon Apr 21 22:23:07 2003
Risking being unsubscribed, I respectfully disagree. After looking at the pictures, without knowing material and sizes of tower members I see the potential problems: It might be nicely made by the to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00401.html (11,311 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Crank up Tower MORE ....Clarify (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Apr 24 22:43:47 2003
What bracing? There is none in the pictures. The bottom legs are made of 3 inch heavy Are all sections moving out at the same time? Lower section is pulling out next one? I have made a small piece of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00427.html (8,099 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] How to fix a bent tower? (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Sun Apr 27 22:06:53 2003
Looking at the pictures, that is not the best way to join the tower sections. Better way is to have legs being bolted together, either overlapping or using sleeves to overlap both legs. If you want t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-04/msg00441.html (9,098 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] Quad square foot wind loading help! (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Sun Feb 9 11:50:53 2003
feet. Now think which way is quad pointed and what does the wind "see". Yuri. K3BU
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00159.html (6,829 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] Tower Bases (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 10:13:59 2003
You would have to use steel frame, not just rebar. Figure out the volume and yoou will see that you are not gaining much in digging. In areas with frost, bad idea. You have to get below frost line. T
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00536.html (7,292 bytes)

37. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:18:30 EST
Hi Joe, can you elaborate on agreement between software designs and actual antennas? VHF antennas allow close verification and measurements. Yuri, K3BU
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00249.html (8,339 bytes)

38. [Towertalk] 100M-long boom Yagi for 20M (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:03:48 EST
Hi Joe, thanks for the info and encouraging news about correlation with real life (2m) models. Yes, it is interesting how many possible solutions there are within the antenna design, and how easy it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00272.html (8,954 bytes)

39. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 09:26:56 EST
But if you try to squeeze juice from them, and that's what you are looking for, then answer is very simple. :-) What you mean apples and oranges? I thought we are talking about apples (Yagis) and app
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00420.html (8,435 bytes)

40. [Towertalk] Re: [Towertalk] Quad vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 18:15:35 EST
Quad-Yagi & VE3BMV designed Razor (Quad/Yagi) beams on 2m antenna range 30 years ago and optimized them for best pattern (F/B, F/S) - gain compromise and 50 ohm impedance. The best quad design is 3 e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00456.html (10,102 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu