Mail Archive Search: <+from:K3BU@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 231 ]

Total 231 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] Modeling (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:06:59 EST; with for Amen! At first, I was skeptical about antenna modeling software especially after some pros in art of using soft modeling could not answer or model some special situations I came across while; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00116.html (12,337 bytes)
62. [TowerTalk] ham radio questions (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:32:45 EST; related I got this email to all calls I am responsible for. Looks like lot of you will get it too. I checked the web site that N2polyWOG has, and it is interesting to see the subjects "researched" fr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00419.html (7,931 bytes)
63. [TowerTalk] Half slopers using a tower (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:08:37 EST; Dumbest statement of the year! Happy New Year! Yuri ________________________________________________________________________ This list is sponsored by the new eHam.net Store. When you buy products li; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00112.html (9,770 bytes)
64. [TowerTalk] Half slopers using a tower (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:23:31 EST; W8JI: >> Each of the unused slopers will act like a "counterpoise" for the K3BU: Dumbest statement of the year!<< WX3K: > Perhaps you would like to share why you think this is the "dumbest statement; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00120.html (10,801 bytes)
65. [TowerTalk] Re: Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:37:51 EST; Brilliant! Just trust Tom that dielectric in the coax doesn't contribute to losses. Some "evaluation" of Force 12 products. Yuri ______________________________________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00632.html (8,198 bytes)
66. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 23:48:01 EST; You asked for it, here it is: To refresh the memory, here is the original W8JI statement: using a foam dielectric. The vast majority of loss is conductor resistance related, and has nothing to do wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00664.html (13,357 bytes)
67. [TowerTalk] Dielectric losses (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:21:16 EST; One more try to educate the "guru": W8JI is "no one" who said: ""The vast majority of loss is conductor resistance related, and has nothing to do with what dielectric is used in a coaxial cable excep; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00672.html (19,948 bytes)
68. [TowerTalk] Best wire (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:21:16 EST; Buy "unstretched" copper wire from home depot, tie one end to a tree or other solid anchor, grab the other end with suitable "handle" and pull. You will feel wire stretching to a point and then resis; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00278.html (7,337 bytes)
69. [TowerTalk] ++ High SWR and Modern Transceivers (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 08:36:29 EST; I can answer it :-) You most likely will be stressing the circuitry in the transmitter. Depending on the SWR cut back protection circuit and its time constant, there could be glitches of overload on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00279.html (8,711 bytes)
70. [TowerTalk] 9913 Reliability (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 11:24:40 EST; Gospel #101? Why then difference in attenuation with higher frequencies for different dielectric? Are you saying that there are no dielectric losses in the coax? Gospel #102? Based on what? Modeling; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00457.html (9,331 bytes)
71. [TowerTalk] 9913 Reliability (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 22:41:10 EST; I read it again: <<To top this all off, there is virtually no difference in performance using a foam dielectric. The vast majority of loss is conductor resistance related, and has nothing to do with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00475.html (10,994 bytes)
72. [TowerTalk] 9913 Reliability (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:26:08 EST; Preceeding FACTs: Razors were on the cover of CQ Magazine in March and July 1980 issues and some description. They can be viewed at <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/ve3bmv/index.htm">VE3BMV Home</A> Y; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00500.html (8,559 bytes)
73. [TowerTalk] re: Is the FCC sharp? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 13:15:15 EST; I'm an engineer too, but not that good :-) The closest I can figure out is that your watch is too fast, you work while you drink and drive, I wouldn't want to guess what kind of engineer and who is O; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00603.html (7,957 bytes)
74. [TowerTalk] vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:08:02 EST; Simple, Tom is (always) right, you are using wrong Pi(e :-) Yuri Radiofest 2001 - DXContestvention Nov. 9-11 see www.verkhovyna.com List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower syste; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00035.html (7,949 bytes)
75. [TowerTalk] vertical antennas (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 19:39:22 EST; Actually it is a little less. Just to be more precise and not to accumulate errors while lying out radials AA4LR example is valid for the length of the arc with radius of the radial length, being .25; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00085.html (8,420 bytes)
76. [TowerTalk] decoupling (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 19:47:09 EST; Maybe more like ".....sleeve ID to coax OD ratio should be large"? Yuri List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN Wireless handles Rohn tower systems, Trylon Titan towers, coax, hardline and more. Also check; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00086.html (7,174 bytes)
77. [TowerTalk] vertical antennas math & 1/2 waves (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 12:08:32 EST; factor with itself. Well, "my" formula is accurate and useful down to 1 radial(s) and cheap (free), practical from 3 and up and it is correct (check it out -:) no need for right angle triangles. On t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00101.html (10,079 bytes)
78. [TowerTalk] Feedlines and phasing (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 11:12:28 EST; Phasing between two antennas depends on their physical location and the desired result (direction). You need to specify those, the best thing is to plug it in to EZNEC, see and play with phasing and; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00247.html (7,602 bytes)
79. [TowerTalk] MFJ ARTIFICIAL GROUND (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 09:16:03 EST; So when I insert loading coil 2/3 up in the mobile antenna and bring it (shorter physical length) to resonance on desired frequency what kind of "length" is it? Yuri, K3BU/m List Sponsored by AN Wire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00429.html (8,971 bytes)
80. [TowerTalk] MFJ ARTIFICIAL GROUND (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 09:44:52 EST; loose Nice dance around another "W8JI gospel" goof :-) Here are some definitions: Electrical Length: The length of any electrical conductor, such as an antenna or transmission line, expressed in wave; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00446.html (9,108 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]