Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ik@subich.com: 132 ]

Total 132 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [TowerTalk] HF LOG-PERIODIC ANTENNAS Comments Please (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:22:21 -0400
Rick, My quote was "the same 7 MHz capability as a C4" Remember, that is a separately fed 40 meter rotatable dipole. 73, ... Joe, K4IK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00543.html (10,424 bytes)

62. RE: [TowerTalk] Replying to the list...AGAIN! (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:23:12 -0400
... because the lists at contesting.com are not democracies. As far as I know ALL of the lists @ contesting.com were set up to "reply to sender" by default. As the administrator of two of the lists
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00564.html (9,494 bytes)

63. RE: [TowerTalk] tram line material (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:56:08 -0400
I used 3/16" EHS years ago at the AD8I multi-single station in the Columbus, OH area. Worked just fine for everything we needed, including a KLM 4L40. 3/16" EHS, a 2" U-bolt on the mast above the mou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00320.html (7,587 bytes)

64. RE: [TowerTalk] FW: Returned mail: User unknown (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:51:58 -0400
Sometimes these things are beyond the control of the list admin. If <geo888@cs.com> subscribed to this list under an alias, e.g., W1AW@arrl.net, no list admin is going to be able to do a thing about
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00472.html (7,558 bytes)

65. RE: [TowerTalk] FW: Returned mail: User unknown (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:33:34 -0400
These bounces do not go to the server (contesting.com), they are addressed directly to the poster of the message. Setting (errors_to:) is not under the control of the administrator of the list. If M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00474.html (8,041 bytes)

66. RE: [TowerTalk] SteppIR Vert (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 23:11:05 -0400
On 40 meters, a rotary dipole at 45' will beat a ground mounted quarter wave vertical and a dipole at 30' will beat the vertical over very good ground for take off angles above 15 degrees. If the gr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00654.html (8,790 bytes)

67. RE: [TowerTalk] 40/30 SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:08:55 -0400
It might be possible to substitute a MonstIR DE into the 3L yagi (20-6) but the 22:50 Ohm un-un would be a problem on 40 and 30 meters. Mike and Jim would need to design a relay switching arrangemen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00126.html (8,116 bytes)

68. RE: [TowerTalk] Wilson 5 element 20 meter monobander (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 18:36:42 -0400
That depends on what you mean by "5 won't work much better than 4." If you are talking forward gain, you're correct - gain is proportional to boom length. If you're talking about maintaining gain ov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00159.html (9,145 bytes)

69. RE: [TowerTalk] Three Fixed Tri-Band Beams on One Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:53:55 -0400
If you are going to do that, keep the beans pointed between 45 and 135 degrees to each other ... the closer to 90 degrees the better. The coupling between antennas will be minimum at 90 degrees but
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00191.html (9,178 bytes)

70. RE: [TowerTalk] Three Fixed Tri-Band Beams on One Tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:15:40 -0400
If you do some investigating, most building codes specify "fastest mile" wind speeds (UBC-97, RS-222-C, etc.) see: http://k7nv.com/notebook/topics/windload.html What standard are Dade and Broward co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00200.html (9,926 bytes)

71. RE: [TowerTalk] RE: [Antennas] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:06:27 -0400
All true ... however, if one is using 75 Ohm cable in a 50 Ohm system (e.g., CATV hardline) then the multiple of 1/2 wavelength shows a 1:1 SWR on a 50 Ohm bridge - exactly what is desired. The 75 O
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00213.html (9,607 bytes)

72. RE: [TowerTalk] Wilson 5 element 20 meter monobander (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:06:27 -0400
The Wilson DB54 was a dual band 20/15 (5 el/4 el) antenna. As I recall the 20 meter elements were fairly evenly spaced to provide "room" for the 15 meter elements. As I recall, the Wilson antennas a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00214.html (9,497 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] For Sale: Cushcraft ASL-2010 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 17:19:23 -0400
For Sale: CushCraft ASL-2010 "Skylog" 20-10M 8EL 6.4DB Log Periodic new in box(es) $400 plus shipping 73, ... Joe, K4IK _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00232.html (6,680 bytes)

74. RE: [TowerTalk] Take off angles, VOACAP, etcf. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:59:40 -0400
As I recall, the N6BV path data is a compilation of all angles over the entire solar cycle and were generated with isotropic radiation (with gain) on both ends. Those angles with higher probability
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00457.html (10,243 bytes)

75. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:57:18 -0400
What is the soil's bearing capacity and how deep is the top of the concrete block? You have several components of force: 1) the force required to tip over the block if it was setting on the surface
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00560.html (8,917 bytes)

76. RE: [TowerTalk] Bad e-mail address (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 19:55:32 -0500
The MailMan software does not know about the alias and thus the administrator CAN NOT FIND the "bad" address. For example, if I used the alias K4IK@arrl.net and had it pointed to my_email@hotmail.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00139.html (8,949 bytes)

77. RE: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:11:46 -0500
What is "complex" about a broadband 2.25:1 transformer? It's no more complex than a current balun ... and needs no adjustment unlike many gamma or beta matches. 73, ... Joe, K4IK ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00207.html (9,177 bytes)

78. RE: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:11:46 -0500
Morel, Of course they are. If you spend a little time working with the modeling programs (or reading the ARRL Antenna Book), you will find peak F/R is relatively narrow on most yagi designs and most
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00208.html (10,713 bytes)

79. RE: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 23:03:14 -0500
"Slightly" is most certainly the right word. If one were designing for > 20 dB F/R on 10 meters, a four element antenna would have a 24 to 26 foot boom. The four element SteppIR uses a 32 foot boom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00228.html (10,429 bytes)

80. RE: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] New antenna system (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 13:53:11 -0500
Actually, the boom is too long to provide high F/R on 10 meters, not too short. F/R on 10 drops into the 10 to 15 dB range which is more than enough for most people (and as good as the measured F/R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00268.html (10,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu