Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n3rr@erols.com: 351 ]

Total 351 documents matching your query.

301. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 03:48:58 -0700
Good response, Steve. I'd add one followup comment. If you space the ground rods closer together than twice their length, you run the risk that the lightning energy will flow UP into one or more of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00504.html (10,360 bytes)

302. [TowerTalk] Galvanized ground rods. WAS: Verticals of ROHN 25 (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 1997 06:34:45 -0700
Nate, It's not clear from your response to Frank that you understood his point. It's not the corrosion of the copper ground rod that's the issue...It's corrosion and subsequent structural failure of
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00759.html (12,037 bytes)

303. [TowerTalk] Tower Grounding Spec (ANSI/EIA/TIA-222-F Jun 96) (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 15:46:36 -0700
ANSI/EIA/TIA-222-F applies to ALL steel towers, guyed or self supported. The issue is bi-metallic corrosion, not how thick the tower legs are. By the way, the title of this publication is: "Structura
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00787.html (11,460 bytes)

304. [TowerTalk] Mast safety (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 1997 02:05:32 -0700
You don't state how thick the wall of the 2" mast is. I have a 2" O.D.x 3/16 " wall chromally mast with a yield strength of 110,000 lbs certified by the vendor. Last fall, I had a licensed tower serv
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00828.html (9,189 bytes)

305. [TowerTalk] 10m yagi separation (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 04:54:04 -0700
10 wavelengths is considered the point at which interaction is negligible. Related: Remember, for those who have not lived through sunspots before, on 10 meters, as is often the case when the sunspot
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-04/msg00907.html (8,281 bytes)

306. [TowerTalk] [Fwd: Re: Antenna video] (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 21:56:57 -0800
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --3F5818E611E1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If anyone is interested, please send an email directly to me: Bi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00103.html (8,622 bytes)

307. [TowerTalk] AB-105 Safety Question (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 04:29:49 -0800
Hi Dave, I have a heavy duty AB-105 tower, not the regular duty one you have, but am familiar with it. First of all, I agree with your approach to issue #1. Although, an alternative would be to build
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00128.html (14,614 bytes)

308. [TowerTalk] AB-105 Safety Question (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 04:48:38 -0800
I believe the product is called: Rustoleum Rust Reformer. I've used it successfully on several tower-related and non-tower related projects. Bill, N3RR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towert
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00142.html (12,721 bytes)

309. [TowerTalk] AB105 (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 05:02:15 -0800
Gary, That tower hasn't been manufactured in nearly 50 years! "All" of what is left is probably owned by hams and passes from ham to ham upon their Earthly demise. Some AB-105 is available from hams
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00143.html (8,409 bytes)

310. [TowerTalk] Mods for CC 40-2cd (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 1997 03:22:39 -0800
-- Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Mods for CC 40-2cd To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 1997 05:26:08 -0800 From: Bill Hider <n3rr@erols.com> To: jhumet@mhv.net, References: <33263517.7722@mh
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00157.html (9,666 bytes)

311. [TowerTalk] Mods for CC 40-2cd (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 06:18:25 -0800
Yes, Jim, I'm stacking two 40-2CDs. Upper one is at 134 ft, lower one is at 67 ft. They play like a champ with my BUL switch in the shack!! 73! Bill -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00172.html (7,496 bytes)

312. [TowerTalk] YIKES! 40-2CD Boom = 22ft!! re: extending the boom (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:04:39 -0800
Mike, the boom on the 40-2CD is 22 feet!!! NOT 12 Feet!! Bill, N3RR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00234.html (8,004 bytes)

313. [TowerTalk] "heat/cold" shrink waterproofing (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 03:05:09 -0800
I made the subject "heat/cold shrink" because I felt it unlikely that many of you knew about the new "cold shrink" available for coax/hardline cable splice waterproofing. Andrew makes such a device,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-03/msg00528.html (8,226 bytes)

314. N connectors-BAD DEAL!!! (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 03:18:48 -0800
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Ed, those "PL-259 like" N connectors are real bad news. They are not 50 Ohms. Look inside the connector. You will see that the "terrain" inside is irregular. They are v
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00000.html (8,295 bytes)

315. Concord - A Turn For The Worse (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 1997 03:35:56 -0800
I recommend you bring a copy of PRB-1 with you, so you're on record with it. Bring an attorney who can talk to that document as well. Bill, N3RR -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00065.html (9,384 bytes)

316. STACKING ??? HELP (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 1997 22:21:20 -0800
Scott, there are more variables than what you mentioned in your message. But, you have all the information and capability to answer your own question as well. The answer to your question can be readi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00182.html (10,654 bytes)

317. 10M antenna stack query (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 02:08:27 -0800
Mick, this question pops up all to often. Now-a-days, the use of computer modelling takes all of the guess-work and querries like this off the table. Buy EZNEC, or another modelling program and run y
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00067.html (8,049 bytes)

318. Feedline and control line protection (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 02:20:01 -0800
YES, ALL COAX LINES SHOULD BE GROUNDED TO THE TOWER AT THE ANTENNA AND AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER BEFORE THE CABLE GOES INTO THE CONDUIT OR BEFORE IT GOES INTO A JUNCTION BOX. YES, USE FEEDTHROUGHS (OR
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00078.html (11,673 bytes)

319. True North in One Sentence (again) (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 06:53:48 -0800
"At the time (local) half way between local sunrise and local sunset, the Sun, if shining, will cast a shadow exactly (true) North-South." That's the sentence. Now, to avoid the FLAMES I received las
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00139.html (9,589 bytes)

320. True North in One Sentence (again) (score: 1)
Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider)
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 1997 23:07:15 -0800
I don't think so, because the sunrise and sunset times should assume 0 Degrees to the horizon from some local location. Once the sun comes up above local obstructions, it's then visable and casting s
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-01/msg00167.html (9,583 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu