Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ travesty: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:47:18 -0400
You should watch his daily RHR web stream. He's not a happy camper about the people attacking what he did. I can't say that I don't blame him because the ARRL DX Contest rules don't really address wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00152.html (28,747 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:26:50 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks Ria. As I only casually operated, I don't have much of a log worth submitting, so I wasn't aware of that. That answers the first question. The second remains open. 73, ron w3wn --Original Mess
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00149.html (35,861 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:16:32 -0400
All logs submitted are here: http://contests.arrl.org/logsreceived.php It does appear as though he has submitted a log. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00148.html (35,080 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Ron Notarius W3WN via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:14:31 +0000 (UTC)
Ed, if I may... Do we know if W2RE has actually submitted a log for the contest? If he hasn't, then I'm not sure what the Contest Manager can actually do.  By no means do I condone rules violations..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00147.html (32,802 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@sbelectronics.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:02:15 -0400
I wanted to update this group that I have formally issued a protest to the ARRL Contest Program Manager and the head of the CAC. Listing 10 violations of the rules that were documented on the video.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00146.html (31,120 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Michael Ritz <w7vo@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
I'm certainly active in contests! Either as W7VO, AA7CR (now WW7E), and sometimes as W7RM. Ria, N2RJ, was on the P&S committee last year, but has moved over to the Admin and Finance committee this ye
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00145.html (31,011 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 12:33:54 -0400
Additionally, W6RGG, N1ND, W3IZ and W9JJ are in the committee meetings. With that said, I always found the structure to not fit well. PSC handles ARES in addition to contesting and DX rules. However,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00144.html (30,262 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Jeff Clarke <ku8e@ku8e.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:44:56 -0400
Sorry my list was outdated. On the ARRL web page it lists K0BBC, N4MB, K5UZ, W7VO, N0DAS and WB4UDQ. I've worked a couple of these guys in contests. Jeff Jeff In practice it worked this way but this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00141.html (25,821 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:46:54 -0400
"I am not sure how ARRL goes about rule changes since it seems like only the BoD can make a change and the CAC only works on things they are asked to handle." In practice it worked this way but this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00140.html (24,025 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 22:13:41 -0400
The event in question that started this thread happened in an ARRL contest. That puts the onus on them to sort it out. Contest rules can only be changed once per year in advance of each contest. Ther
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00139.html (19,833 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:49:20 -0400
CAC has been discussing this internally. I do suspect that any evaluation of specific rules violation is a separate discussion from rules changes that can happen. 73 Ria, N2RJ _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00132.html (18,833 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:31:44 -0400
Ria, I am a member of the ARRL Contesting group and am waiting for this incident to be discussed there. My question was "Are the sponsors listening?" It would seem to be to their benefit to be monito
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00131.html (17,851 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: "rjairam@gmail.com" <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 09:41:05 -0400
Hi Stan ARRL has its own contesting reflector on groups.io and several of us monitor it. Contacting your director or CAC representative will get the discussion going. The CAC monitors the group discu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00116.html (15,759 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 23:13:59 -0400
I agree with Peter that the sponsors of the major contests now need to get together and hammer out some new rules/categories. Not just for this current situation, but with a better eye on leveling th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00113.html (14,225 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Merging Social Media and Contesting (score: 2)
Author: <contesting@w2irt.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:29:47 -0400
Ed has it 100% right here. I'm good with innovation, but don't you dare pretend to compete with folks who are keeping within both the letter and spirit of the rules. I would strongly support the addi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-03/msg00100.html (11,830 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 2)
Author: Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:07:18 +0300
Reasonable and well balanced comments in general Ed. However, I tend to question the second part regarding "Learn to use the cluster and effectively manage the balance between running for rate and ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00141.html (15,542 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 2)
Author: "Igor Sokolov" <ua9cdc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:20:25 +0500
I think the best way to select deserving for WRTC would be to have one or two WRTC like competitions (virtually with the same rules as WRTC) in each selection area. That would allow those ops who is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00140.html (13,193 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC2018 Qualifying (score: 2)
Author: "Ed Richardson" <Ed_richardson@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:58:06 -0600
There have been a lot of posts concerning these changes and it looks like I am in the minority, but I like the changes. First, the ultimate goal remains unchanged. Operate in the designated contests
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-12/msg00136.html (11,502 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [RRDXA] E73M - I have cheated (score: 2)
Author: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:00:58 -0400
If we did some planned tests, as I proposed in the great distance based score debate, it would get us some rough idea over time how dipoles (which are stable and easy to predict) compare from various
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00171.html (12,239 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [RRDXA] E73M - I have cheated (score: 2)
Author: "Kostas Stamatis" <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 15:35:21 +0300
I agree in many points with Christian. Beside this the contest commitee must show its power. K1TTT makes a report after major contest. How many of them were punished? Noone. But if we don't punish fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00167.html (12,729 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu