Mail Archive Search: <+from:EDWARDS>

Results:

References: [ +from:EDWARDS: 458 ]

Total 458 documents matching your query.

141. RE: [RFI] TVI (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:32:26 -0600; So if you live in CA and have a ham next door and rcv interference; you call the FCC and they tell you they don't handle interference complaints any longer; and the ham's hands are tied by law and ca; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00039.html (9,193 bytes)
142. RE: [RFI] Quiet Shack PC Systems? (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:33:30 -0600; When I purchased my PC, I took a portable SW rcvr along and shut down all nearby CRTs and listened to each of the CRTs I was looking at. Then I bought the quietest one. It so happens that the quiet o; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00069.html (8,760 bytes)
143. RE: [RFI] What About Manassas??????? (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:07:37 -0600; Steve, It may mean that the roll our was only in a HOA/CC&R area where no active HF hams live. I think this was also the case in NC. Seems only prudent if you'd want to operate a BPL system for a whi; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00165.html (7,939 bytes)
144. RE: [RFI] Today's Wall Stree Journal front page article on hams & BPL (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:00:05 -0600; Both of these complaints were posted to the BPLandHamRadio yahoogroup along with more data and info than anyone can imagine. I recommend to anyone trying to keep up with current developments to subsc; /archives//html/RFI/2004-03/msg00179.html (10,353 bytes)
145. RE: [RFI] WSJ-BPL (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 08:33:25 -0600; Here's another take on the subject of pigeon-holing of engineers. Most, if not all ethical codes for professional engineers require that engineers put society & the public good above that of his comp; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00003.html (8,689 bytes)
146. [RFI] Correspondance with UTC (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:03:55 -0500; Thought I'd share this exchange I had with the UTC (United Telecom Council). It can be read top to bottom. I just can't believe he does not see all the similarities. I find it interesting that when t; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00034.html (13,824 bytes)
147. RE: [RFI] PLCA Response to WSJ Article (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 23:23:56 -0500; Thank you Michael! I was beginning to think you'd all forgotten your 1990s "Clintonese" in 4 short years. Obviously the money spent in research and testing to "eliminate claims of interference" was t; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00079.html (9,226 bytes)
148. RE: [RFI] BPL....(and more re UTC Meeting) (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:01:19 -0500; --Original Message-- 5) Stick to interference with mobile stations and public safety. N2EA -- For years the FCC has let Nextel cause interference nationwide to critical infrstructure and public safet; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00080.html (9,120 bytes)
149. RE: [RFI] another one sided news essay (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:04:08 -0500; "There's no interference because electrical current and digital 1s and 0s run at different frequencies." Now we know what the BPL geeks mean when they say there's no interference. They mean no interf; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00095.html (7,497 bytes)
150. RE: [RFI] Lawsuit (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:08:19 -0500; It seems to me that this is the only way we're going to stop them. The FCC sure won't no matter how bad the interference. If you're a ham and not already an ARRL member, I strongly urge you to become; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00102.html (7,340 bytes)
151. [RFI] RE: ARRL (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:48:25 -0500; Good rebuttal Alex. You are correct, the ARRL does not represent you. In fact no organization represents you at all. To the federal government, when it comes to all of the commercial interests that d; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00117.html (10,358 bytes)
152. RE: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 13:04:41 -0500; Funny, Everything you said about the Satellite bands also applies to the HF/VHF bands as well. Are you also appalled that a few tinkering HF hams would stand in the way of the usefulness of HF-BPL fo; /archives//html/RFI/2004-04/msg00139.html (8,098 bytes)
153. RE: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 12:03:20 -0500; One huge difference is our HF bands have little or no commercial value, just the opposite of the UHF/SHF bands. Bill, No offense meant, but what the heck are you smoking? As long as hams are using th; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00008.html (10,338 bytes)
154. RE: [RFI] Protecting our frequencies (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 17:36:46 -0500; Of course I do Bill, but with BPL we are not talking about putting these HF signals over twisted pair, cat 5, or shielded cable or some other appropriate medium. We are talking about placing them ont; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00021.html (9,473 bytes)
155. RE: [RFI] Wasted and Useful Bandwidth (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:14:58 -0500; On the scale required for most or all automobiles to convert, you'd have to cover up the State of Arizona and then some. Not that some states don't need covering up, it's just not feasible. The NIMBY; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00025.html (8,433 bytes)
156. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 22:16:02 -0500; Yea, he voted for BPL before he voted against it. Sorry, couldn't resist such a good opening. Going back in my hole now. de k0il _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@c; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00038.html (7,306 bytes)
157. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 11:00:57 -0500; As far as BPL goes, I believe the FCC Commissioners are made up of 2 republicans and 2 democrats plus Powell. They all voted for it (1 abstained-same effect as for it) to continue. No politician is g; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00051.html (9,046 bytes)
158. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? Give up? NO! (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 14:14:21 -0500; Rob, You make some good points, but I don't think it's big business that has caused this apathy, it's big government. After the FCC rcvd the last round of comments and with over 95% of those comments; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00056.html (9,783 bytes)
159. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? Give up? NO! (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2004 08:34:30 -0500; I haven't allowed anyone to make me apathetic. I just didn't have the time to waste on the FCC and it's appointed commissioners who all had their minds made up BEFORE they were even appointed. I foll; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00064.html (8,089 bytes)
160. RE: [RFI] BPL Protest Opportunity? Give up? NO! (score: 1): Author: Ed -K0iL <eedwards@tconl.com>; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 20:25:32 -0500; Ed, I wasn't calling on the ARRL to give up the battle front with the FCC. Quite the contrary; it's because of the great work that you and the crew are doing at the League that I feel my limited effo; /archives//html/RFI/2004-05/msg00104.html (10,504 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]