Mail Archive Search: <+from:EDWARDS>

Results:

References: [ +from:EDWARDS: 458 ]

Total 458 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [RFI] New EOC Building (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:24:07 +0000; You make a good point Jim. There's nothing I could find in the guidelines/standard aimed at operations below 30MHz. However, an EOC is a really just special Comm Site. I wouldn't ignore industry reco; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00032.html (9,503 bytes)
322. Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC... (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:55:29 +0000; "I am not enough of a lawyer to know what the line is for how much I can help a grower quiet down an operation, it is after all still not legal federally..." I'm not a lawyer either. I too am wonderi; /archives//html/RFI/2014-07/msg00064.html (10,649 bytes)
323. Re: [RFI] Cree LED Light Bulb (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 19:25:06 +0000; I have to admit my experience with CFL bulbs has been very limited until the last few years. So I might be and probably am missing something in this discussion. No one seems to be accounting for the; /archives//html/RFI/2014-08/msg00023.html (11,826 bytes)
324. Re: [RFI] Nature's RFI on the way. (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:33:01 +0000; Another good article on the subject from IEEE 2 years ago with good sidebar articles and video: "Of all the parts of the power grid, high-voltage transformers are among the most likely to fail in a g; /archives//html/RFI/2014-09/msg00022.html (9,420 bytes)
325. [RFI] Cisco IPTV Receiver RFI emissions (score: 1): Author: "Ed-K0iL" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 00:26:00 -0600; Those who have run into this with AT&T's U-Verse wireless receivers won't be surprised by this. I've migrated to CenturyLink's Prism TV from their Telechoice cable TV system. Love the Prism TV pictur; /archives//html/RFI/2014-12/msg00001.html (8,110 bytes)
326. [RFI] FW: broadband interferes with radio signals (score: 1): Author: "Ed-K0iL" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>; Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:59:22 -0600; The Telegraph - 07 January 2015 "You could be prosecuted if your broadband interferes with radio signals" http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/t elecoms/11325914; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00012.html (7,070 bytes)
327. [RFI] FCC Updates Equipment Certification Rules (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 16:10:02 +0000; I know there have been discussions in this group about FCC certification so thought some of you might be interested in this recent change in the FCC's equipment authorization process. http://www.comm; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00017.html (7,947 bytes)
328. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 21:45:36 +0000; Excellent point Jim. All services' grounds (AC, telephone, television, internet and ham shack cable entry point & ham tower) must be bonded to a single-point ground system. There's no limit on number; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00116.html (9,403 bytes)
329. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 22:03:48 +0000; Here's a couple. http://www.kf7p.com/KF7P/Products.html http://www.smithspower.com/brands/polyphaser/ There are several others; probably Talley, Tessco, Texas Towers, AES, & HRO may have some as well; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00117.html (10,663 bytes)
330. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:47:37 +0000; Frank, You might know this since you have some tall towers up in the air. Did the contradictions between NEC (copper ground rods) and EIA/TIA-222F (12.2.2-galvanized steel ground rods) ever get resol; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00136.html (10,636 bytes)
331. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 22:07:25 +0000; Jim, I'm not sure if the lightning protection measures are tailored to VHF/UHF sites in any way I can see. Lightning doesn't care what band the antennas and equipment are. They all blow up the same w; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00137.html (12,619 bytes)
332. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "Ed K0iL" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:46:51 -0600; Jim, I was referring to the entire documents which cover both bonding and grounding separately so I wasn't even aware I was getting the two confused or referenced it. I'll be glad to look up any port; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00143.html (11,241 bytes)
333. Re: [RFI] w7ekb & ground rods (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:23:43 +0000; Rik, In quick scan couldn't find anything on NEC Article 250 supporting your statement. Did you find anything in 250? I only found a reference to "6 ft minimum" distance, but that might be old refere; /archives//html/RFI/2015-01/msg00158.html (12,966 bytes)
334. Re: [RFI] A request for RFI service. (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 13:46:28 +0000; Ken, Have you checked with your local ham clubs to see if they have any members who are also licensed electricians? Keep contacting the FCC by phone and letters. They apparently do eventually send ou; /archives//html/RFI/2015-02/msg00021.html (10,275 bytes)
335. Re: [RFI] Low RFI 60w CFL bulb (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:46:35 +0000; Good info Chris. Thanks for sharing with the group. It would also be interesting what level of RFI you get at other distances greater than 1.5 ft. I might try this before I reinstall my antennas on m; /archives//html/RFI/2015-02/msg00054.html (9,590 bytes)
336. Re: [RFI] Zapped (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:28:14 +0000; Instead of each side mocking each other over what is or isn't safe, how about we all just take the position to be safe and following mfr & gubermint recommendations for safe usage: http://tinyurl.com; /archives//html/RFI/2015-02/msg00095.html (9,836 bytes)
337. Re: [RFI] Anyone ID the cause of this rain-initiated RFI? (score: 1): Author: "Ed K0iL" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>; Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 18:26:12 -0500; Could be a lot of things. Few years ago I had a bent squirrel guard on a transformer that acted up every time it rained. Sounded like a Jacob's Ladder. New squirrel guard fixed it. Good luck tracking; /archives//html/RFI/2015-04/msg00003.html (9,382 bytes)
338. [RFI] FW: New NPSTC Report About RF Interference from Energy-Efficient Lighting (score: 1): Author: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:46:21 +0000; Public Safety is now taking notice of this RFI issue. From NPSTC report/questionnaire: " NPSTC was approached by several individuals and organizations who reported interference to public safety radio; /archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00002.html (8,825 bytes)
339. Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC enforcement of radio-interference issues (score: 1): Author: "Ed K0iL" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 17:32:07 -0600; Yes, thank them for the entire RFI group! ARRL action can and does get some utilities to respond properly, but it sometimes also takes internal politics to nudge it along. 73, de ed -K0iL Ed, Please; /archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00113.html (11,236 bytes)
340. Re: [RFI] What I use to find Interference Sources (score: 1): Author: "Ed K0iL" <eddieedwards@centurylink.net>; Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:18:30 -0600; Charlie, In southeast Nebraska, RFI complaints from non-hams include cable TV companies/customers, FAA, and telephone customers who are ignored by their telephone companies, and finally a few AM radi; /archives//html/RFI/2015-07/msg00134.html (9,398 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]