Mail Archive Search: <+from:RadioIR@charter.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:RadioIR@charter.net: 86 ]

Total 86 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:31:10 -0500; It's very strong here. On a vertical it is running S9+10 to S9+15 on peaks with QSB taking it down to S9. As I posted earlier it was running S1 to S7 at noon. That was due to QSB. I can hear it all d; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00069.html (12,503 bytes)
82. Re: Topband: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 22:19:17 -0500; This is looking like somewhere near the Florida/Georgia border, Jacksonville, Fl to Brunswick, Ga area. _________________ Topband Reflector; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00071.html (8,616 bytes)
83. Re: Topband: FW: Steady Carrier on 80 CW (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 08:01:03 -0600; The carrier on 3501.6 was off this morning (I don't know for how long). It just came back at 1355 UTC. No RTTY at the beginning. That's twice with no RTTY at the beginning and once with RTTY. _______; /archives//html/Topband/2013-11/msg00087.html (9,978 bytes)
84. Re: Topband: FT5ZM (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:50:30 -0600; Merv if you look at a gray line map you will see that the path from New Mexico to FT5ZM at 1350Z is in the gray line while at the same time its three hours after your sunrise. Also after sunrise for; /archives//html/Topband/2014-01/msg00297.html (9,196 bytes)
85. Re: Topband: EP6T (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:51:57 -0600; This should have been easy, but no joy here. EP6T was peaking S9 in Alabama last night on 80 meters. They were 30 dB over my noise floor. That means there should be stations from NA at least S9 at th; /archives//html/Topband/2015-01/msg00159.html (10,895 bytes)
86. Re: Topband: Topband loading coil (score: 1): Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:20:11 -0500; If you got an SWR of 1.2 on 160 meters from an 80 meter inverted L, you had a lot of loss either in the radial system or in the loading coil. The resistive part of the feedpoint impedance of that ant; /archives//html/Topband/2015-06/msg00023.html (9,585 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 86
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]