Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:amps@txrx.demon.co.uk: 190 ]

Total 190 documents matching your query.

41. [AMPS] Loading/linearity (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:01:38 +0100
operation. but please can My very simplistic view. If you look at the current curves, reducing the anode resistance tends to take the low voltage end of the load line away from the non-linear areas.
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00196.html (7,343 bytes)

42. [AMPS] Bias question (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 07:13:13 +0100
In a transistorized HF RF amp is there any rule of thumb how to set the bias correctly, in this case for linear op., forexample the standing current might be so and so many percent of the Ic? I don&a
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00197.html (7,626 bytes)

43. [AMPS] Re: bias question (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:33:07 +0100
Fellows, thank´s a lot for the input on my question. I understand this much better now. Sure wasn´t as simple as I thought but what is these days. I did find the G3SEK bias circuit on the
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00271.html (8,261 bytes)

44. [AMPS] S units (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:47:59 +0100
Devices (AD8307; it truly accurate Only if it's hooked in outside the AGC loop. Steve -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html Submissions: amps@contesting.com Administrative requests: am
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00272.html (7,637 bytes)

45. [AMPS] 4cx10000/imd/sunits/splatter etc (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 07:52:37 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: 'Rich Measures' <measures@vc.net>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 13 July 1999 16:38 Subject: RE
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00273.html (8,771 bytes)

46. [AMPS] Re: Power Transfer (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:02:26 +0100
delivers (as per transfer My HV and No, Mike you are not. It's true to state that maximum possible power transfer occurs when source and load resistances are equal (there are also caveats about react
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00357.html (8,923 bytes)

47. [AMPS] Re: Power Transfer (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 08:32:35 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: 'Steve Thompson' <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 19 July 1999 09:50 Subj
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00366.html (7,446 bytes)

48. [AMPS] equalizing resistors/caps on small HV power supply?? (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 18:13:23 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> To: itr@nanoteq.co.za <itr@nanoteq.co.za> Cc: amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 27 July 1999 16:29 S
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00551.html (9,431 bytes)

49. [AMPS] Re: (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 22:09:29 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: 'G3SEK' <g3sek@ifwtech.demon.co.uk>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com>; Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>; 'W8JI@contesting
/archives//html/Amps/1999-07/msg00604.html (7,879 bytes)

50. [AMPS] Capacitor resonances (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 07:36:15 +0100
If anyone cares to search in the archives, about a year (maybe more) ago I put one or two tuning caps. on the network analyser to look for resonances. region, and was quite lossy - the resitive part
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00247.html (6,748 bytes)

51. [AMPS] 50-500 MHz in solid-state? (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 07:33:36 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Jon Ogden <jono@enteract.com> To: Scott Townley <nx7u@arrl.net>; Amps Reflector <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 13 June 1999 15:34 Subject: Re: [AMPS]
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00419.html (8,737 bytes)

52. [AMPS] 3CX800 (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:02:03 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Radiodan W7RF <radiodan@mediaone.net> To: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 14 June 1999 19:50 Subject
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00444.html (8,640 bytes)

53. [AMPS] 50-500 MHz in solid-state? (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 07:37:54 +0100
power limit are actually as the frequency rises. It depends on the device - I use PointNine Technologies devices at this power and over the frequency range without any bother. Motorola and Philips UH
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00463.html (9,115 bytes)

54. [AMPS] 3CX800 (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:08:04 +0100
A while ago someone mentioned an early version of the datasheet showing higher ratings. Is this available off the web anywhere, or could someone send me a copy please? Thanks, Steve -- FAQ on WWW: ht
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00469.html (8,509 bytes)

55. [AMPS] 50-500 MHz in solid-state? (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 08:05:56 +0100
--Original Message-- From: George K. Watson <watson@epiloglaser.com> To: 'Steve Thompson' <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>; 'Amps Reflector' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 15 June 1999
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00470.html (8,105 bytes)

56. [AMPS] hipot testing (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 22:54:09 +0100
Having got a hipot tester working, I'm looking for suggestion about leakage levels for testing transformer insulation. I have a really nice low resistance transformer, 920-0-920 1A secondary with lea
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00504.html (7,452 bytes)

57. [AMPS] New World Record for 8877 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 23:01:32 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Peter Chadwick <Peter_Chadwick@mitel.com> To: 'Rich Measures' <measures@vc.net>; 'amps' <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 17 June 1999 15:15 Subject: RE
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00516.html (8,892 bytes)

58. [AMPS] hipot testing (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 08:32:55 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> To: Steve Thompson <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 18 June 1999 01:07 Sub
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00518.html (8,072 bytes)

59. [AMPS] hipot testing (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 20:55:52 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> To: Steve Thompson <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 18 June 1999 09:22 Sub
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00528.html (8,950 bytes)

60. [AMPS] hipot testing (score: 1)
Author: amps@txrx.demon.co.uk (Steve Thompson)
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 07:55:23 +0100
--Original Message-- From: Rich Measures <measures@vc.net> To: Steve Thompson <amps@txrx.demon.co.uk>; amps@contesting.com <amps@contesting.com> To: <amps@contesting.com> Date: 19 June 1999 16:05 Sub
/archives//html/Amps/1999-06/msg00532.html (7,722 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu