Search String: Display: Description: Sort:


References: [ 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] One more thing about USB (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:52:34 GMT
I almost forgot - Icom has released a radio with USB standard: the IC-R9500. Yeah, it's a receiver, but it kinda means it's possible, dunnit? =) Bob, NQ3X -- No cute furry animals were harmed in prep
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00092.html (6,738 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Radio appliances (long and OT) (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:50:12 GMT
I've been reading this thread with considerable interest, given the problems I've been having getting my rig and laptop interfaced. I submit that expecting a standardized interface system is not unfa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00093.html (10,690 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Code and Canadian Rock Bands (score: 1)
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:37:50 GMT
"Don't forget "YYZ" by Rush. The CW is really not that bad, considering it's done by the whole band with their instruments." True. But the character spacing is off. Has to be, in order to get the tim
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-07/msg00170.html (6,726 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] LOTW & Forums vs. "reflectors" (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:35:30 GMT
I might be painting myself as a total noob here, but... For the life of me, I can't see what's so difficult about signing up with LOTW. Follow the steps, blip, blam, wait for the postcard. Maybe it's
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00103.html (8,613 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW & Forums vs. "reflectors" (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:37:42 GMT
I wouldn't dream of reinventing the wheel, for I've seen quite a lot of people start ham-radio-related forums sites only to flop due to lack of interest. Since CQ-Contest is where the community resid
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00111.html (8,769 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] NAQP - Operating off the continent? (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:40:01 GMT
So, now we've established that some of us like different things in our Internet activities, let's talk about contesting. =D I've this daydream of contest operating from an island somewhere. It's kind
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00118.html (7,548 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] Team for NAQP SSB (score: 1)
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:52:23 GMT
Anyone want to join me on a team for NAQP SSB today? Please respond privately to: bob AT reconstructinghistory DOT com The more the merrier! 73, Bob NQ3X -- No cute furry animals were harmed in prepa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-08/msg00167.html (6,959 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Davis" <>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:16:27 -0400
Brad et al., While I don't have the decades of CW operating (much less CW contesting) other respondents possess, I thought I'd weigh in. It depends. ;-) You mentioned portability as one of your conce
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00241.html (10,485 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] (Bad) Contest Haiku (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Davis" <>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:54:51 -0400
Ooo! Can I try? As Autumn leaves change, His mic gain is set too hot; His spurs are awful. Amplifier warm, Wires sway gently in the breeze. World Wide will start soon. Hear you all tomorrow evening,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00356.html (8,948 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] QSL Ethics question (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Davis" <>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:07:33 -0500
Hi! Here's a bit of an ethical question: I received a QSL request from a DX op who was operating at a club station during CQWW CW. He's asking me to QSL his personal callsign for awards use. Is it "r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00641.html (7,616 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] QSL question (score: 1)
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:08:52 GMT
Thanks to all who replied to my QSLing question. No, it was not a joke. What may seem perfectly obvious to one person may be obscure to another. That's why one asks questions. Speaking of which, mine
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00665.html (7,549 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Callsigns & People (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Davis" <>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:08:42 -0500
However, an inconceivably large number of electrons was terribly inconvenienced. -- Original Message -- From: "Michael Coslo" <> To: "reflector cq-contest" <> Sen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00066.html (10,519 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Kilo" or "Kilowatt" (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Davis" <>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:35:22 -0500
I've been following this thread for a bit now, and think lots of good points have been raised. Yes, the currently-accepted International phonetics aren't the best. They are, however, internationally
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00569.html (11,747 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Davis" <>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:24:36 -0500
Which works fine for the purposes of this discussion - a good solution. However, there is an unfortunate consequence - anyone wishing to perform propagation analysis is screwed, because one end of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00122.html (10,603 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings (score: 1)
Author: R P Davis <>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 13:50:17 -0400
alerting First, your whole argument rides on the assumption that Skimmer is always defined as "Dx alerting assistance", which is not self-evident; that's one of the things this debate is trying to ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00447.html (11,691 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings (score: 1)
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:41:49 -0500 (EST)
I have contemplated opting out of the list, because while this debate at least has been (mostly) respectful, it has seldom been thoughtful and quite often so pedantic as to be little more than an exe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00457.html (11,859 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer musings (score: 1)
Author: R P Davis <>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:29:12 -0400
Guy, I understand that SO2R is difficult to learn and even more difficult to master. I have not yet begun on that path (as my scores in recent contests will show!), though I hope to give such a chall
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00460.html (10,285 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sunspots for sale? (score: 1)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 19:17:15 -0500 (EST)
Here: are Sunspots on eBay. Grow your own! Cheers, Bob NQ3X On May 07 15:56, "B. Scott Andersen" <> wrote: -- No cute furry animals were harmed in preparin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00158.html (7,639 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX SN...has to be a better way! (score: 1)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 06:12:11 -0500 (EST)
I *never* feel loud, so for me AGN is a way of life. ;-) 100w and wires will do that to a fella. [snip] Here's some validation from PA. I found a quick QRS to make a big difference in solid copy. You
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00397.html (9,233 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - What shall we do? (score: 1)
Author: Bob Davis <>
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:19:54 -0400
Paul, While I normally have a high level of respect for your opinion, this is, simply and respectfully put, bollocks. Not true? Do not radios, amplifiers, switchboxes and filters cost money? Do not t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00020.html (10,097 bytes)

This search system is powered by Namazu