Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:brentbaum5323@msn.com: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground Rods in rocky soil (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:19:39 -0700
I, too, would like to see some ideas. My soil is almost the same, except my QTH is on a prehistoric riverbed. My neighboring hams are on silt/loam soils. but my top soil is only about 4 to 6 inches d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00529.html (9,590 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Stub question (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:51:28 -0700
Chris, Will the choke and resistor techniques also work on wire dipoles? 73, K7MEI Brent From: "Christopher J Galbraith" <cgalbrai@umich.edu> To: "'EC1CT Fernando'" <ec1cwg@dxhunters.com>,"'towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00711.html (10,610 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Tower Foundations, II (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:59:42 -0700
Slight change on the topic. I'm almost ready to go with my 33 foot unknown-brand crank up. (For those who want to take a stab at making an ID, I'll send you photos.) Zoning is clear, my small communi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00247.html (7,840 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Foundations, II (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:32:26 -0700
Thanks all for the replies. Interestingly enough the building department, when pressed, said they didn't care about anything but the foundation. On the rest they defer to the experts in the field, i.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00299.html (9,176 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] High voltage lines (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:48:03 -0600
Given the number of times I've had helicopters go out from under me, carry me into the ocean, etc. I'd be more afraid of the ride in and out. If God truly meant for men to fly it wasn't in machines w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00351.html (9,216 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Help needed>>> Aluminum Tower Identification (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:20:33 -0600
George, Sorry, no help from this QTH. I was a Communications-Electronics Officer in the Corps for quite a few years and never saw this type of tower. Of course the other, richer services had more toy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00618.html (11,372 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Horizontal tower movement at the top (score: 1)
Author: "BRENT BAUM" <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 14:39:17 -0600
In addition, a tree grows thicker as it grows taller. Eventually anything attached to the trunk will eventually wind up inside the trunk. Many species of conifers will "bury" nails, fencing, forest s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00075.html (13,794 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Taking up slack in wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 09:04:09 -0600
If you have rope at the ends of the wires you can get out your old Scout hand book and look up how to tie a taut line hitch out at the ends of the rope. Then as the tower is lowered you, or a couple
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00456.html (9,757 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast failures (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:59:33 -0600
I currently have a 32 foot length of heavy top rail that is guyed at the top (3 guys). ALL it holds is a 20 meter dipole, and I wouldn't put any more on it. Even with guys it provides an entertaining
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00049.html (9,786 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] EMI concerns;Detectors/Radiation Allergies (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 11:42:02 -0600
towertalk@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] EMI concerns;Detectors/Radiation Allergies> > Do a search on Google for Sarah Dacre, and you'll find several articles about her ailment, along with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00566.html (11,732 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld Question (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 17:01:37 -0600
One thing to watch out for with mushroomed heads on metallic items intended to be driven with a hammer: Shrapnel. Pounding against a mushroomed head can make flakes fly off with the speed of bullets
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00018.html (10,490 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Vibrator for 2x2x4 hole? (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 09:54:00 -0600
A vibrator is the best way to go, however as long as you are diligent you can use a length of 2x4 to tamp the concrete every 6 inches or so of lift as the concrete is poured. Hard to keep up with a f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00436.html (7,479 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupine (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:09:26 -0600
Naw, the porcupines are used to keep the plastic owls from nesting in your tower. towertalk@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupine> > Gee, I already have a plastic owl facing north on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00491.html (9,484 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Feedback (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:47:27 -0600
I originally joined the group seeking information on a fold over crank up tower that I was given by our local historical railroad in return for building them a better antenna system. Mostly I moved t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00315.html (9,798 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Digging a 5'x5'x8' tower footing (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 14:05:56 -0600
When I contacted a local PE (Heber City, UT) regarding my tower base he asked how I was going to dig the hole. I told him I would use a large auger and then square it up. His reply was in effect, goo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00210.html (11,248 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] dipole in space question (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:37:42 -0600
See my comments attached to your questions. The patterns you see are general conventions of momentary snapshots of an antenna system. These conventions, or standards, keep us all on the same sheet of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-06/msg00269.html (8,951 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] What NOT to do when climbing (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 13:05:46 -0600
Training develops habits and automatic responses to situtations. Obviously this ham was well trained, but when he elected to forego one element of his training the rest took over. Semper Fi, K7MEI Br
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00008.html (8,748 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] orthographic projection (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:39:06 -0600
Try www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml 73 K7MEI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00217.html (7,502 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Happy news for a change (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:20:08 -0600
Good deal for K8JHR. The small Utah town I live in requires a permit for the tower foundation, everything else is unrestricted. Guess it helps to have a former ham in the building ordinance departmen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-08/msg00290.html (12,249 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] No end caps (score: 1)
Author: BRENT BAUM <brentbaum5323@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 12:37:29 -0700
As a variation on the pot scrubber theme, why not try some wadded up window screen material? It seems to be reasonably UV resistant and sufficiently porous for your needs. Brent, K7MEI> Date: Tue, 9
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-12/msg00240.html (8,258 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu