Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com: 476 ]

Total 476 documents matching your query.

161. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:11:15 -0400
Quite a bit of the radiation from 5/8 wave verticals is at relatively high elevation angles - above 40 degrees elevation. (Perhaps useful for VHF mobiles that need to hit mountain top or hill-top rep
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00342.html (8,991 bytes)

162. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:06:23 -0400
Hi Herb. I'll bet that 1/2 wave sloper worked great! When this thread got started, I modeled several verticals in EZNEC from 1/4 wave to 5/8 wave in height. I sent the plots around to folks that were
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00347.html (11,169 bytes)

163. Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorter versions?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:26:43 -0400
??? --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Richard Fry Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:27 PM To: topband@contesting.com Subject: Topband: 5/8 wavel
/archives//html/Topband/2013-09/msg00353.html (10,289 bytes)

164. Re: Topband: Fixed capacitor source needed (150pf 5KV) (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 10:05:39 -0400
Hi, Herb I would think that 2-3 of those 500 pF caps in series would be just fine! Have you tried just one? Also, are those capacitors on the load side of the tuner as an aid in matching really low i
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00021.html (9,219 bytes)

165. Re: Topband: 160m Inverted L High SWR (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:29:54 -0400
Hi, Bill In your first post, you indicated that min VSWR was 2.9:1 at 1833 KHz, indicating that the system was resonant exactly where you wanted I to be. Could I respectfully suggest that at 1.8 MHz,
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00026.html (11,046 bytes)

166. Re: Topband: 160m Inverted L High SWR (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:42:31 -0400
10-fo' !! :-) All what work at the antenna? Just add a 2400 pF shunt capacitor and adjust the length of the antenna for resonance? Works perfectly on my vertical. Rick N6RK _________________ Topband
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00028.html (9,140 bytes)

167. Re: Topband: 160m Inverted L High SWR-SUCCESS! (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 17:32:45 -0400
FB, Bill! Good afternoon all...and a good one it is. I won't bore y'all with the fine details, but will say that here are the final results: Vert lgth: 55 ft Total lgth: 137.5 ft C-P wires (4 @ 9' hi
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00038.html (7,847 bytes)

168. Re: Topband: W8ji ATR-10 design 160M? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:24:22 -0400
Thanks for sharing the patent info, Frank! Really interesting! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of donovanf@starpower.net Sent:
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00112.html (12,452 bytes)

169. Re: Topband: W8ji ATR-10 design 160M? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:55:46 -0400
I expect that needs to be a good quality and seriously heavy duty switch that's used to vary the configuration of the matching network - at least at full power! Thanks, Tom! Charlie, K4OTV wants to s
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00116.html (10,716 bytes)

170. Re: Topband: Raised radial question from NH (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 12:37:17 -0400
Hi, Jim In my experience, the answer is "no" to both questions - although a full size inverted L , while being a very effective transmit antenna can be a really noisy receive antenna. Can you go out
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00140.html (8,299 bytes)

171. Re: Topband: Raised radial question from NH (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:06:45 -0400
Good luck, Jim!! BTW I've worked some good stuff all round the world on 160 with a 70 foot tall Inv L with two elevated radials that ran along my lot lines. For receiving, the 'KAZ" terminated loop i
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00144.html (10,862 bytes)

172. Re: Topband: Raised radial question from NH (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 14:44:34 -0400
Hi, Bruce Well, the KAZ antenna is named for Neil Kazaross one of the original designers that optimized the terminated delta loop for MW broadcast reception. The 10' X 40' K KAZ that I threw together
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00146.html (10,729 bytes)

173. Re: Topband: impedance of 3/8 radiator and question on matching (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:47:24 -0400
Hi, Carsten You might try it with just a series C into the 3/8 wave on 80m. The VSWR may not be that bad! Then you could always add a 4:1 balun or transformer if needed. 73, Charlie, K4OTV Hi, I am p
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00173.html (8,527 bytes)

174. Re: Topband: Antenna switch rating for high SWR? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:33:52 -0400
I liked the idea of the ceramic based knife switch! That ought to take most anything us hams could throw at it at pretty much any VSWR! :-) Charlie, K4OTV The rub with any of this is the contact-to-c
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00175.html (11,702 bytes)

175. Re: Topband: Light fiber question (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 15:14:16 -0400
BTW, Bill, amplitude modulation and "mixing" are the same process mathematically. In a "mixer" we just select one of the "sidebands" -depending on whether we are doing "up-conversion" or "down-conver
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00211.html (10,440 bytes)

176. Re: Topband: Balun question (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:42:04 -0400
Well, might work. Another idea though, check with Fair-Rite - I believe that they have some cores that wil fit over .405 RG-8, and I know they have lots that sill fit over RG-58 or RG-8X. If you don'
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00216.html (9,064 bytes)

177. Re: Topband: Balun question (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:47:58 -0400
That would work as well. I used something similar, but with less turns to precede the 4:1 current balun feeding the drivers on my home brew 5-band quad. Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topb
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00218.html (9,637 bytes)

178. Re: Topband: Balun question (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:55:14 -0400
What "works flawlessly", Randy? The link? J 73, Charlie, K4OTV From: Randy Lake [mailto:randyn1kwf@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 7:51 PM To: Charlie Cunningham Cc: Jim Bennett; Gary@ka1
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00220.html (10,005 bytes)

179. Re: Topband: Balun question (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 20:03:23 -0400
Just teasin' you, Randy! J I think the snap-ons would be quick, simple and very effective and should outlast the antenna, I expect! I am sorry! That was not very clear. The info on chokes worked wond
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00222.html (11,693 bytes)

180. Re: Topband: Balun question (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:10:26 -0400
True! Gary, The W2AU balun he was happy with isn't a balun at all...it basically has NO common mode suppression. The impedance of a few turns of coax is also next to nothing on 80 meters, but almost
/archives//html/Topband/2013-10/msg00224.html (9,995 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu