Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com: 476 ]

Total 476 documents matching your query.

381. Re: Topband: ARRL Request for Comments on Digital Modes - OPPOSE THIS! (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 15:11:32 -0400
Well, what most don't seem to realize is that this push for "wideband" data is coming mostly from yachtsmen who want a service in the amateur bands to avoid the cost ot wideband marine data services
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00090.html (11,103 bytes)

382. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:33:20 -0400
That should work fine, Gary! You would have around 3 dB loss in a two-way splitter + a SMALL amount of mismatch-loss for the 50-75 ohm mismatch. I would expect that if your radio will work with the b
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00100.html (9,299 bytes)

383. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 21:41:05 -0400
One word of caution, Gary, if the CATV splitter is a transformer type, rather than resistive it may of have enough low-frequency response for 160 m! Check around with RS and your local electronics st
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00101.html (8,841 bytes)

384. Re: Topband: Passive Receive Antenna Splitter (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:03:15 -0400
Yeah, that's why I cautioned Gary about using CATV splitters at 160m. Seems that he has enough reserve gain with his Beverage and K3, that he could certainly tolerate the loss of a 50 ohm resistive s
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00107.html (13,142 bytes)

385. Re: Topband: Legality of Circumventing Commercial Maritime ISP Services?? (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 23:37:49 -0400
Well, that is exactly what it's all about, Dan!! Some of us need to press those points really hard with FCC and ARRL! They are trying to usurp our amateur spectrum for commercial and monetary purpose
/archives//html/Topband/2014-03/msg00113.html (8,982 bytes)

386. Re: Topband: 1000 feet 5/8" hardline or 600ohm True Ladder line. (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 20:31:16 -0400
?? A big vertical is omni directional and has high signal levels. This is in contrast to the beverage which has low signal levels and tries to null out certain directions. If I disconnect the vertica
/archives//html/Topband/2014-04/msg00075.html (9,864 bytes)

387. Topband: FW: Using 80m 1/4 vertical on 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 01:15:15 -0400
Hi, Mike Could you add 1 or 2 top wires and turn it into an inverted-L or Tee for topband? Or you could add an 80m trap at the top followed by enough horizontal (or sloped) wire to resonate on 160, w
/archives//html/Topband/2014-06/msg00003.html (8,268 bytes)

388. Re: Topband: K4OTV (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 06:24:05 -0400
Good morning/good afternoon, Andrzej! How kind and thoughtful of you to inquire about my; health!! I'm OK, but I do have some multiple sclerosis that slows me down a bit, but it's doing much better t
/archives//html/Topband/2014-07/msg00004.html (8,247 bytes)

389. Re: Topband: de K3JJG: Glad ur Still Kickin'! :) (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 16:59:41 -0400
Thanks, Ed! Yes, Andy is a prince - and a great guy! Really heartwarming to have someone on the "other side of the pond" checking on me! Well, my MS is MUCH better than it was last summer! Some of th
/archives//html/Topband/2014-07/msg00006.html (9,166 bytes)

390. Re: Topband: Top band: VK3ZL SK today (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:49:55 -0400
So true! I'm relieved, though, that Bob's suffering has come to an end and that he's in a better place! 73 - Rest in peace, Bob! Charlie, K4OTV What a loss. Early mornings will never be the same. RIP
/archives//html/Topband/2014-07/msg00023.html (8,485 bytes)

391. Re: Topband: VK3ZL SK today (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 23:16:52 -0400
Great idea, Jeff! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Radio KH6O Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:32 PM To: john Cc: topband@cont
/archives//html/Topband/2014-07/msg00031.html (9,527 bytes)

392. Re: Topband: Ferrite Cores (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:01:13 -0400
I agree with all those points, Jim! Over the years, professionally, we designed many Fair-Rite, cores into most of our electricity, gas and water meter and electricity load-management products and sh
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00049.html (11,166 bytes)

393. Re: Topband: Ferrite Cores (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:21:30 -0400
Well, I don't think there is a "one-size" or "one--mix" "fits all" preferred solution. I've wanted to try some 31 mix cores for common-mode isolation at 80 and 160. On the other hand, some of the Fai
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00058.html (12,663 bytes)

394. Re: Topband: Ferrite Cores (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 14:22:16 -0400
I've mostly used 73 mix tubular and binocular Fair-Rite cores of all sorts of common-mode chokes on coax and for matching transformers 160/80m receiving loops and for input match to my 3-500ZG amp. H
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00064.html (14,746 bytes)

395. Re: Topband: [Bulk] Re: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach" (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 16:23:40 -0400
That's really impressive! 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Grant Saviers Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014 11:26 AM To: Guy Oling
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00083.html (11,730 bytes)

396. Re: Topband: 2009 TX3A- Double half delta loop (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:14:34 -0400
Great write-up! Charlie, K4OTV Finding many references to the 2009 Chesterfield TX3A ability to hear well, I decided to check it out. Found a very interesting write up by AA7JV. It was definitely a b
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00125.html (7,753 bytes)

397. Re: Topband: JT65/JT9 MODES (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:19:13 -0400
Amen!! 73, Charlie, K4OTV Alex, I much imagine a similar statement was uttered many years ago when the first use of AM transmitters came into use and probably again when SSB came into use. Its not th
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00133.html (8,711 bytes)

398. Re: Topband: Fw: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach" (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:23:17 -0400
As long as this thread had been going on - perhaps I should be down shopping for real estate on the Outer Banks - but then I'd be more exposed to hurricanes, washed-out roads and lost power! J 73, Ch
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00142.html (11,643 bytes)

399. Re: Topband: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach" (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 14:27:30 -0400
Doesn't help you HEAR any better! Generally, on top band, even with my modest inverted- L with a few elevated radials, if could hear 'em I could work 'em! With 500 W. Best thing I ever did for myself
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00148.html (15,059 bytes)

400. Re: Topband: Modeling the proverbial "vertical on a beach" (score: 1)
Author: "Charlie" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 20:24:43 -0400
Yeah!! -This one's been "done to death'! "If you believe - no proof is necessary. If you don't believe - no proof is possible"! J 73, Charlie, K4OTV --Original Message-- From: Topband [mailto:topband
/archives//html/Topband/2014-08/msg00171.html (11,686 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu