Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@outlook.com: 433 ]

Total 433 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 08:49:10 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: When I was a new ham back in the late 1950's, the FCC issued a number of citations for excess power and the details were printed in QST. As I recall, som
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00053.html (9,977 bytes)

62. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:31:11 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: A bit off topic, but I have always wondered why the FCC thinks it has the power to censor profanity. The Constitution guarantees free speech and the Supr
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00067.html (10,164 bytes)

63. Re: [Amps] Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:36:20 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I'm sure the folks who got the citations would be interested in your comments. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailin
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00068.html (8,768 bytes)

64. Re: [Amps] [Bulk] Re: Time for New Power Meter (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:37:37 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: They DID get in your shack. The procedure was this: 1 Park a vehicle nearby with field strength measuring equipment. 2. Take the FS reading on a carrier.
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00069.html (10,588 bytes)

65. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 149, Issue 10 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 16:47:40 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Quoting from Part 97: 97.103 Station licensee responsibilities. (a) The station licensee is responsible for the proper operation of the station in accord
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00071.html (7,996 bytes)

66. Re: [Amps] titan 425 low output power (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 19:57:21 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: That is approximately 17 dB gain, which is more than the FCC rules allow for a commercially built amp. Perhaps the factory "corrected" the gain to make i
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00077.html (7,284 bytes)

67. [RTTY] SPE 2K-FA amplifier duty cycle (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 22:57:44 -0700
I'm thinking of getting an SPE 2K-FA amplifier and I have a question about duty cycle at full power. I understand it will run full 1500 watts on SSB and CW, but not so on RTTY, at least not brick on
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00123.html (7,178 bytes)

68. Re: [Amps] SPE 2K RTTY Duty Cycle (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:30:42 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: RTTY has no error correction, so the answer unfortunately is yes. Every mode has a tradeoff. Modes with no error correction are faster but need more powe
/archives//html/Amps/2015-05/msg00131.html (7,753 bytes)

69. Re: [RTTY] SPE 2K-FA amplifier duty cycle (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:11:14 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The Expert Amps folks did indeed have a good price following Dayton, but it expired on May 26. I was tempted but ended up buying a used one I found onlin
/archives//html/Amps/2015-06/msg00061.html (8,675 bytes)

70. Re: [Amps] Amps Digest, Vol 151, Issue 6 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 20:13:20 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: In order to achieve a wide range of impedance matching, you need to have two of the three elements variable. Variable capacitors are preferred by most de
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00021.html (7,553 bytes)

71. Re: [Amps] SB-220 6 meter conversion parasites (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:50:52 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: 300 ohms is a little high. Most designers use from 50-100 ohms. You need to fine the "sweet spot" for the value. If it is too high, the circuit becomes e
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00057.html (8,043 bytes)

72. Re: [Amps] Triode grounded grid amp strange failure (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:57:46 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: The 6A10 diode is a good choice for this function. It has a surge rating of 400 amps (!) and should handle anything your amp can throw at it, and they ar
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00058.html (8,333 bytes)

73. Re: [Amps] SB-220 6 meter conversion parasites (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 13:58:44 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: There is a better way, IMO, to do the conversion although it's too late now for Steve. But for anyone else considering this, it can be done while still u
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00062.html (7,992 bytes)

74. Re: [Amps] SMPS Question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:33:16 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: Sounds good to me. Where does one get such a supply and what is the cost? Generally, if you change the Ep and increase the Ip to maintain the same power,
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00075.html (7,617 bytes)

75. Re: [Amps] Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:00:59 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: What that means is this: With the amp completely UN-POWERED, you apply a 50 MHz signal at the input and monitor the output. Adjust the neutralizing circu
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00134.html (7,935 bytes)

76. Re: [Amps] Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 20:20:17 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: If you remove the tube, you are also removing the tube's internal capacitances. Better to leave the tube in place and just remove all voltages from it. E
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00139.html (7,890 bytes)

77. Re: [Amps] Follow-up...re: Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 11:11:01 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: A well designed amplifier should be stable without the above loads. Not all amps are but it is a good target to shoot for. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00143.html (7,222 bytes)

78. Re: [Amps] Follow-up...re: Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 22:54:13 -0700
Roger, it would help if you could draw a schematic and post it on a website somewhere. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00155.html (8,532 bytes)

79. Re: [Amps] Follow-up...re: Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:31:19 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I agree with Vic's comments 100%. The only way to neutralize with a pi-input circuit that I know of is with a coupling coil from plate tank to input tank
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00158.html (10,226 bytes)

80. Re: [Amps] Follow-up...re: Time to ask for help. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:56:39 -0700
-- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) -- ORIGINAL MESSAGE --(may be snipped) REPLY: I see a potential problem with that. Having only the single variable capacitor will case a phase shift when adjust
/archives//html/Amps/2015-07/msg00165.html (10,430 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu