Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 233 ]

Total 233 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [Amps] Tokyo HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:33:44 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Bad enough the CB'ers blatantly violate the law, now here's a licensed ham advocating the same thing. Shame on you, John. 73, Bill
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00311.html (7,884 bytes)

222. [Amps] Passive grid triodes? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:29:26 -0800
I don't recall seeing any passive grid triode circuits and I'm wondering why. They always seem to be tetrodes. Is it a neutralization issue? 73, Bill W6WRT ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00314.html (6,425 bytes)

223. Re: [Amps] Tokyo HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:08:45 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Absolute BS and you know it. You and I are not interpreters of the "intent" of the law. That can only be done by the courts. If you
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00317.html (7,857 bytes)

224. Re: [Amps] Tokyo HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:52:19 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not so, Jim. One could argue that a kw amp on 11 meters does no harm at all. They could argue that if a kw on 28 MHz is legal, why
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00320.html (8,285 bytes)

225. [Amps] RE : Tokyo HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:25:30 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In this sense, it means a feeling of guilt for having done a bad thing. Hopefully, repentance will follow, but I'm not holding my b
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00322.html (8,223 bytes)

226. Re: [Amps] Tokyo HP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 03:16:43 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The original question was about interpreting the "spirit of the law". There are times when the "spirit of the law" is a valid issue
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00334.html (9,015 bytes)

227. Re: [Amps] FCC & 10 M Amps (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 07:31:15 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N7IHY's comments are perfectly valid and do not diminish the "image of Amateur Radio". The only image I see tarnished is that of th
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00338.html (7,674 bytes)

228. Re: [Amps] Queation on toroid core materials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 12:09:00 -0800
Observing quietly from the sidelines but now have a question: Why use ferrites for transformers when powdered iron seems to have superior loss properties, especially in the HF region? Or doesn't it?
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00355.html (8,069 bytes)

229. Re: [Amps] Two transformer questions (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:37:27 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Here's a thought. I haven't actually tried this but I think it should answer your question. If anyone spots an error in my thinking
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00372.html (8,168 bytes)

230. Re: [Amps] Nat NCL2000 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:14:10 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All the experts - 99.99% - recommend NOT using ALC derived from the amp to feed back to the TX. Tune the amp at maximum output and
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00422.html (7,137 bytes)

231. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:21:48 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Well then the guy who asked the original question should go for the soLID state amplifier. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _____________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00423.html (9,594 bytes)

232. Re: [Amps] 87A vs. IC-PW1 (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:18:10 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pretty bold statement there, Jim. Are you sure you want to call half the CW ops in the world lids? 73, Bill W6WRT _________________
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00424.html (8,240 bytes)

233. Re: [Amps] QSK or not (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:24:56 -0800
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Using QSK on RTTY, you have to listen during that ten or twelve microseconds between mark and space. Only non-lids can do it, you k
/archives//html/Amps/2006-02/msg00425.html (7,702 bytes)

Current List: 221 - 233
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu