Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@yahoo.com: 1185 ]

Total 1185 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [Amps] 3-500Z viable after long storage? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:57:56 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I'm wondering if some seals are better than others. Many years ago Tektronix stopped making CRTs out of glass and went to ceramic because the seal was better. I suspect the s
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00236.html (8,507 bytes)

142. Re: [Amps] plate bypass capacitor (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:00:11 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Ten times the plate load impedance? For the typical 160 meter amp running 3 kV and 800 mA with a plate load impedance of aprox 2200 ohms, that would require a choke with a re
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00239.html (9,277 bytes)

143. Re: [Amps] plate bypass capacitor (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:19:53 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: I keep forgetting about you QRP guys. I was talking REAL amplifiers. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00245.html (9,071 bytes)

144. Re: [Amps] plate bypass capacitor (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:23:02 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: If you mean the series feed where there is a bypass cap at the junction of the tank circuit and RF choke, there is very little RF there and practically any choke will do. Or
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00246.html (9,813 bytes)

145. Re: [Amps] plate bypass capacitor (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:58:32 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Some amps do that, but IMO a better approach is to use a choke with no resonances in any ham bands. The one sold by RF Parts meets that requirement. I have used that one in s
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00252.html (9,678 bytes)

146. Re: [Amps] WTB ceramic stand off's (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:03:40 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: If you don't find a cheaper source, Mouser carries these as part number 534-7677. Go to www.mouser.com and enter the part number in the search box. Good luck on your project.
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00283.html (7,668 bytes)

147. Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:34:11 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Either metal-film or metal-oxide resistors are significantly more stable than carbon comp. Their only possible disadvantage is that some values may exhibit more inductance th
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00292.html (7,856 bytes)

148. Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:52:41 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Before I retired from the avionics biz, I worked at a company that had a $10,000 HP impedance analyzer. The company didn't mind us using it during off hours and I learned a l
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00301.html (8,106 bytes)

149. Re: [Amps] SELL: DPST Flip Top Safety Switch (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:22:09 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Next time the XYL starts yapping at you, let her see you slowly reach for the switch..... :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00315.html (7,936 bytes)

150. Re: [Amps] Carbon film or metal oxide film resistors for low-power RF circuits? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:06:15 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Plain old rubbing alcohol will do the job and won't harm any plastics. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com ht
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00336.html (9,463 bytes)

151. Re: [Amps] HV Measuring. (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:53:39 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: By my calculations, 240 VAC would give you 376 VDC across the caps. You're ok. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contestin
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00343.html (7,418 bytes)

152. Re: [Amps] RF Choke At Amp Output ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:17:32 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: If your antenna is an open circuit for DC as many are, there would be a HV pulse applied to the coax through the plate blocking cap. If the DC leakage on your coax and antenn
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00360.html (7,548 bytes)

153. Re: [Amps] RF Choke At Amp Output ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:49:18 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: That's ok until someone down the road changes antennas. You may not be the only owner of the amp. I like to think one of my grandkids might someday use grandpa's old amp. :-)
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00366.html (7,739 bytes)

154. [Amps] Good article about inductors (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:10:01 -0700
http://www.edn.com/contents/images/159688.pdf As the author points out "Of the three basic passive components?resistors, capacitors, and inductors?inductors are the least ideal and, therefore, the mo
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00367.html (7,077 bytes)

155. Re: [Amps] RF Choke At Amp Output ?? (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:43:17 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: A resistor in place of the choke is not a good idea. If the blocking cap shorts, the resistor will almost certainly blow open and you are right where you were if there was no
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00379.html (8,332 bytes)

156. Re: [Amps] suppressor material (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:14:56 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: A better approach, IMO is to build a circuit that is stable without any parasitic suppressor at all. Tubes that are physically small such as the 8877 lend themselves to this
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00397.html (8,185 bytes)

157. Re: [Amps] one mo' SB-220 fix (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:59:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: Sounds good to me except I would hard wire it inside the amp so that years from now, someone who doesn't know what it's there for might discard it because "it doesn't do anyt
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00418.html (7,889 bytes)

158. Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:07:55 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: A great post and an excellent summation. Thanks, John! 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00419.html (8,048 bytes)

159. Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:12:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: That is quite a remarkable statement. Before you besmirch Rich's reputation any further, can you back up your statement with names, dates and facts? 73, Bill W6WRT __________
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00420.html (7,934 bytes)

160. Re: [Amps] Design VS parasitic (score: 1)
Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:24:35 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: REPLY: You are missing the fundamental purpose of a parasitic suppressor. It does not "trap", "load" or "absorb" the parasitic. Instead, its job is to reduce the gain at the parasit
/archives//html/Amps/2009-08/msg00421.html (8,126 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu