Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 550 ]

Total 550 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] ROS (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:34:50 -0700
Unless you started transmitting on, or too near, a frequency that was already in use, there is no reason to QSY. (Moreover, QSYing reinforces special interest groups laying claim to specific frequenc
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00109.html (11,087 bytes)

2. Re: [RTTY] Spot frequency (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:54:00 -0700
Discrepancy between your RTTY frequency and what is spotted by another station depends on what each of you uses for a reference. Most people use their VFO frequency as what they spot. Depending on wh
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-06/msg00141.html (9,433 bytes)

3. Re: [RTTY] NAQP Teams (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 22:27:33 -0700
Nick, W4GKM, queried: On the NCJ website at http://www.ncjweb.com/rttynaqpteamreg.php 73, Ed -- Ed Muns - W0YK www.w0yk.com _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@cont
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-07/msg00054.html (6,684 bytes)

4. Re: [RTTY] DXP-38- keep it or sell it? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2010 12:23:33 -0700
Rudy Bakalov, N2WQ, asked: In my experience, 99% of the time they decode identically. Sometimes one is better than the other. The DXP38 prints off-frequency signals better. This is helpful in S&P and
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-07/msg00130.html (9,688 bytes)

5. [RTTY] CQ RTTY Contests' Searchable Scores Database (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 17:36:28 -0700
Now that the searchable scores database are online for the history of the CQ WW RTTY and CQ WPX RTTY contests, I hope you're finding them interesting and useful. We could use your help in letting us
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00010.html (7,858 bytes)

6. Re: [RTTY] Your complaints (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:13:28 -0700
This is a huge loss for the subscribers of the RTTY reflector. Joe has consistently been extremely helpful to everyone, on a wide variety of topics, very few of which have anything to do with MicroHA
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00092.html (10,044 bytes)

7. Re: [RTTY] best hardware RTTY decoder? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:29:45 -0700
Depending on how you define "best", this conclusion will be correct or not. RITTY is decade-old software technology that is superior to most other software and hardware decoders in some signal detect
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-08/msg00163.html (9,332 bytes)

8. [RTTY] FW: Reminder : Your Webinar is on Sunday, September 19, 2010 19:00 UTC (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 09:59:23 -0700
A PDF of the slides to be used in the Webinar is available from the home page of the website: www.cqwwrtty.com. 73, Ed - W0YK CQ RTTY Contest Director -- w0yk@cqwwrtty.com www.cqwwrtty.com www.cqwpxr
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00065.html (7,596 bytes)

9. Re: [RTTY] FW: Reminder : Your Webinar is on Sunday, September 19, 2010 19:00 UTC (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:28:24 -0700
Yes. The recorded webinar will be posted in a day or two at http://www.pvrc.org/webinar/webinars.htm. Meanwhile, a PDF of the PowerPoint presentation is available on the CQ WW RTTY website at http://
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-09/msg00068.html (8,394 bytes)

10. Re: [RTTY] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:36:05 -0700
Yes, this is the crucial question. Understand that log checking is going to give the nod to the sent exchange when the received exchange differs. But ... that doesn't mean the sent exchange is what i
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00107.html (9,778 bytes)

11. Re: [RTTY] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:00:39 -0700
In this case, K0YR did not submit a log. So the log checking used the QSOs in the logs of the stations he worked to determine the sent exchange. While a lot of ops logged 'T0M' (with a zero), most lo
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00114.html (14,401 bytes)

12. Re: [RTTY] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:13:42 -0700
You're right ... K0YR did not submit a log, so log checking used the QSOs from the received logs to determine his sent exchange. Far more people logged 'TOM' with the letter 'O' and that is more logi
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00115.html (14,038 bytes)

13. Re: [RTTY] Log Checks? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:15:58 -0700
Depends on the contest. ARRL contests and some CQ contests have them online, but in other contests you email the contest manager who will reply with your LCR. 73, Ed -- Ed Muns - W0YK www.w0yk.com __
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-10/msg00116.html (7,704 bytes)

14. Re: [RTTY] 2011 Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:01:30 -0800
This is true for 2011. The algorithm is that the CW NAQP is the second full weekend of January and the RTTY Round-Up is the first full weekend, EXCEPT when 1 January falls on Saturday, every seven ye
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00020.html (7,539 bytes)

15. Re: [RTTY] 2011 Roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:55:11 -0800
Bruce doesn't "control" contest weekends, but he is the CW/SSB NAQP contest manager. As such, he is a reasonable person to approach about swapping the CW and SSB weekends. However, I've already passe
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00028.html (8,007 bytes)

16. [RTTY] WAE RTTY Practice (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:04:55 -0800
Let's have 30-minute practices at 22Z Thursday (11 November) and 01Z Friday (12 November) for the WAE RTTY contest this weekend. As usual, the earlier practice is better for European stations while t
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-11/msg00034.html (6,881 bytes)

17. Re: [RTTY] Certificate of CQWW 2009 RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 08:17:22 -0800
This is the first email I've seen from you, Alex. Your certificate was mailed this past summer to the address in the header of your Cabrillo file. I will confirm that address with you in a private em
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00028.html (8,394 bytes)

18. Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:50:56 -0800
Telecommunication laws differ in each country and determine what frequencies licensees can transmit on. For example, US hams can use CW or digital from 7000-7125 on 40m. Japanese hams are only allowe
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00049.html (12,182 bytes)

19. Re: [RTTY] Sound card for RTTY/MMTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:37:50 -0800
Dennis, W1UE, asked: I just purchased three ThinkPads with Windows 7 Professional and got the GWC 5.1 channel audio adapter for each. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829126101)
/archives//html/RTTY/2010-12/msg00256.html (7,965 bytes)

20. Re: [RTTY] ARRL RU band changes? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 11:50:48 -0400
Scott, K8SM, asked: No band change limit for Single-Ops. For Multi-Op (Multi-Single), the limit is 6 band-changes per clock hour. Single-Ops using assistance are in the Multi-Op category. Ed - P49X (
/archives//html/RTTY/2011-01/msg00137.html (7,679 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu