Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 551 ]

Total 551 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] 2014 CQ WW RTTY Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 11:43:55 -0700
Ed W0YK _____ mistakes in records table 2013 - must be 2014 73, Sam LY5W One from IQ9UI M/M -- Forwarded message -- From: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com> Date: Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:44 PM Subject: [CQ-Contest
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00046.html (9,020 bytes)

342. Re: [RTTY] RTTY popularity in Italy? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 10:51:06 -0700
Unfortunately, a disproportionately small number of Italians, and Europeans in general, responded to the recent RTTY Contesting Survey. 62 Germany responses 58 England responses 38 Italy responses 29
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00053.html (7,878 bytes)

343. Re: [RTTY] RTTY popularity in Italy? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 11:32:11 -0700
Perhaps, but the 2010 survey had 270 European responses and 470 NA responses. Ed W0YK ________________________________________________________ Might be a language problem? ___________________________
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00056.html (9,454 bytes)

344. [RTTY] March 2015 NA Sprint Results (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 10:28:43 -0700
Results for the NA RTTY Sprint are posted on the NCJ website. http://ncjweb.com/sprint-scores/preliminary/rttysprint032015prelim.txt 73, Ed W0YK _______________________________________________ RTTY m
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00071.html (6,766 bytes)

345. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Scores Database Updated (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 18:06:01 -0700
The online CQ WW RTTY Contest scores database has been updated with the 2014 contest results. http://www.cqwwrtty.com/scoresry.htm?yr=ALL 73, Ed W0YK _______________________________________________ R
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00079.html (6,887 bytes)

346. Re: [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Scores Database Updated (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 09:47:46 -0700
Good question, Larry. The CQ WW RTTY database is not setup to capture Overlay data. I'm looking into whether this can be added. Thanks, Ed W0YK Are we have a chance to see Overlay scores for CQ WW RT
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00081.html (8,704 bytes)

347. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Contest Public Logs (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 05:43:20 -0700
Public logs are now available at http://www.cqwwrtty.com/publiclogs/ For the past three years of the CQ WW RTTY Contest, 2012 -2014. Use them and the online Scores Database at http://www.cqwwrtty.com
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00083.html (7,021 bytes)

348. Re: [RTTY] Results of 2015 RTTY Survey (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 12:12:43 -0700
The only people who DIDN'T miss the survey results were the attendees of the Dayton RTTY Forum. That's the only public presentation so far. Don is working on putting it up on www.rttycontesting.com.
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-05/msg00085.html (7,559 bytes)

349. Re: [RTTY] North American QSO Party, RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:17:50 -0700
NAQP RTTY manager K6UFO reads this reflector and I'm confident will make a sound decision on the issue.  _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://l
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-07/msg00021.html (10,620 bytes)

350. Re: [RTTY] Dayton RTTY Social Event (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:52:37 -0700
I'm swamped in harvest issues right now, but here is my thinking. First, I'm delighted with Cheryl's offer to organize a group RTTY Contesting Dinner at the Dayton Hamvention next spring. I really ap
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00026.html (9,913 bytes)

351. [RTTY] NA RTTY Sprint (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:52:57 -0700
I apologize for the team registration and log submittal failures for the NA RTTY Sprint last night. I forgot to have the dates changed in our servers when we moved the fall RTTY Sprint from October t
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00040.html (7,387 bytes)

352. Re: [RTTY] Sprint log submissions? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 12:47:00 -0700
The direct robot email works: rttysprint@ncjweb.com But the web upload is still programmed for 10 October. When that is corrected, the logs received listing will also work. Ed W0YK Mine worked fine y
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00049.html (8,617 bytes)

353. Re: [RTTY] Sprint log submissions? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:56:15 -0700
Yes, 00-04 UTC Sunday of the third full weekend of September each year. It is correct in the WA7BNM calendar. Ed W0YK Hi Ed, I now have access to the ncjweb.com server and will be correcting the log
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00051.html (9,861 bytes)

354. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 12:30:20 -0400
The CQ WW contest season opens this weekend with the RTTY mode. Rules are available at http://www.cqwwrtty.com/rules.htm in English and several other languages thanks to a number of volunteer transla
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00054.html (7,239 bytes)

355. [RTTY] Practice Sessions for CQ WW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:52:06 -0400
Thursday, 24 September, 2200-2230z Friday, 25 September, 0330-0400z Follow CQ WW RTTY Contest Rules on whatever bands are open for you (80-10m). Try out your hardware, software, messages, operating,
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00056.html (6,546 bytes)

356. Re: [RTTY] Practice Sessions for CQ WW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 22:01:36 -0400
Correct. 73, Ed _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00059.html (8,284 bytes)

357. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:08:07 -0400
Why is RTTY different than CW and SSB? It is normal to send your call just once in response to a CQing station on CW and SSB.  Only if conditions warrant do you send it multiple times.  Maybe RTTYers
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00080.html (9,399 bytes)

358. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 13:12:34 -0400
Yes, response delay can be due to an SO2R operator locked out while the other radio is transmitting. One of the SO2R skill-delvelopment challenges is to continually reduce that delay. Hence, ops like
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00084.html (12,296 bytes)

359. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:52:24 -0400
Of course. The more times you send each other's call sign, the more certain that you have it correct. Where do you draw the line on how many times you verify the other station's call? Almost no one d
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00105.html (13,377 bytes)

360. Re: [RTTY] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 19:21:32 -0400
This is so obvious and ingrained, its out of my consciousness.  And, yes, the CQ WW Committee added it to the rules a couple years ago.  Our reason was that some "errant" stations were cleansing thei
/archives//html/RTTY/2015-09/msg00115.html (15,763 bytes)

Current List: 341 - 360
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu