Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ed@w0yk.com: 551 ]

Total 551 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [RTTY] Bartg RTTY Spring (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:27:37 -0800
When I sign W0YK/6 in the BARTG contests, I think of the '/6' as part of the exchange so that stations know what area multiplier I am. That's the reason BARTG requires we sign with our Call District
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00103.html (7,811 bytes)

382. [RTTY] CQ WW RTTY Scores Database Updated (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 12:34:40 -0800
The results of the 2015 CQ WW RTTY Contest have been added to the Scores Database at http://www.cqwwrtty.com/scoresry.htm. A certificate link is in the far right-hand column for each call sign. Ed W0
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00127.html (7,167 bytes)

383. Re: [RTTY] VP8STI on RTTY? (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:19:35 -0800
I was lucky enough to work them on 30m RTTY and 15m RTTY the first day. And, it was indeed luck. The pileups were horrendous and they were in my noise floor. I spent hours after that, over the rest o
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-01/msg00141.html (8,465 bytes)

384. Re: [RTTY] Friend File (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 09:37:48 -0800
Yes, it is confusing because there are differing views about how to contest. Across all contest participants there are different interests and goals. On one extreme are the serious contesters who are
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00022.html (10,293 bytes)

385. Re: [RTTY] Friend File (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 10:38:42 -0800
Read "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell, where he explains why it is important to be born right. Ed W0YK _________________________________________________________________ hobby. To which, Jeff WK6I repli
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00027.html (9,112 bytes)

386. Re: [RTTY] Friend File (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 19:31:33 -0800
The entry in the current friend.ini file is W7WHY=TOM, so if someone is sending "THOMAS", then they are using another database such as the FCC file. Same for Jeff at W7RN. In fact, there is no entry
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00030.html (9,346 bytes)

387. Re: [RTTY] Friend File (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:21:36 -0800
WriteLog doesn't send diddles if there is no name in the friend.ini file. That part of the message is simply omitted, so the transmission is fine. It is nice if you create the message to make sense w
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00048.html (8,447 bytes)

388. [RTTY] Practices for CQ WPX RTTY Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:36:45 -0400
2100-2130 UTC, Thursday, 11 February 0100-0130 UTC, Friday, 12 February (Thursday evening NA time) On Thursday, let's have two 30-minute practice sessions to check out our station equipment, software
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00069.html (9,199 bytes)

389. Re: [RTTY] CQ WPX Practice (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 14:41:50 -0400
Posted here Monday: 2100-2130 UTC, Thursday, 11 February 0100-0130 UTC, Friday, 12 February (Thursday evening NA time) On Thursday, let's have two 30-minute practice sessions to check out our station
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00082.html (7,714 bytes)

390. Re: [RTTY] Major contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:15:03 -0400
Thanks, Bill, for cheerleading this weekend's event! Point of clarification, though ... Single-ops are encouraged to operate as much of the 48 hours as they desire. The 30-hour "limit" is not on oper
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00085.html (8,672 bytes)

391. Re: [RTTY] Major contest this weekend (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 16:48:33 -0400
In theory, yes, the log check software should only count time for the band of your entry class. But, if it doesn't, then we'll update the software. Ed _____ I have a question about single-op, single-
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00087.html (7,841 bytes)

392. Re: [RTTY] Simple thing that seemed to improve my S&Ping (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 14:38:21 -0400
Actually, you should always send a callsign correction. Some of the CQ contests are requiring this now in the rules, in reaction to some entrants who clean their log post-contest by using outside dat
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00101.html (12,391 bytes)

393. Re: [RTTY] My FT-950's RTTY power level admonition (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 17:32:28 -0400
I hope these painful operators keep coming back in future contests.  If so, then they will likely evolve to the better contest operating techniques the rest of us should be displaying.  Let's not dis
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00143.html (9,455 bytes)

394. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 17:48:04 -0400
What Ken K6MR wrote below.  On point #1, I will add the other station's callsign at the end of my run exchange if I think his callsign sent at the front of the exchange may have been QRM'd.  I just t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00168.html (12,003 bytes)

395. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 18:37:35 -0400
If the contest rules require 599 to be sent in the exchange, then it is a violation to not send it.  It doesn't matter if we think it is unnecessary.  The contest sponsor requires it and that's all t
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00170.html (11,748 bytes)

396. Re: [RTTY] No 599 (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:00:29 -0400
The log submission robot will not accept QSO lines with missing fields like RST. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00173.html (7,970 bytes)

397. Re: [RTTY] Decoder thoughts after WPX (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:52:44 -0400
Right.  So MMTTY is my main decoder because it responds faster than 2Tone.  2Tone Selective and Flat/Flutter (doesn't matter which) are my second and third decoders for clear copy when MMTTY doesn't.
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00178.html (10,075 bytes)

398. Re: [RTTY] Decoder thoughts after WPX (score: 1)
Author: Ed Muns <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 23:27:00 -0400
Why not make the squelch user-selectable? _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00182.html (8,706 bytes)

399. Re: [RTTY] RTTY Contest Operating (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:00:33 -0800
I don't think the miniscule speed decrease is a factor. In my mind, it just looks silly to send 5NN on RTTY, because the CW technique of speedup is actually a slowdown on RTTY. OTOH CW ops are so use
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00185.html (9,173 bytes)

400. Re: [RTTY] Decoder thoughts after WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Ed Muns" <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:08:57 -0800
David G3YYD recommends Selective as your first 2Tone decoder mode. If you have more 2Tone decoders on the same audio stream, then the second one should be either Flat or Flutter. It turns out that th
/archives//html/RTTY/2016-02/msg00186.html (9,371 bytes)

Current List: 381 - 400
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu